Yes I know that, and everybody know that, but I would like to know the opinion of those who have looked into this specific case.Endmass is the primary driver of deflection as i understand it
icbw
Please don't scrap my thread!!Why dont you think its just the end mass?
Hi, I can't directly answer your question, but this info might be slightly relevant.Why the Revo have less deflection than the Cynergy, ( profile, rigidity, endmass...)?
12.4mm and my question is about deflection, do you known DEFLECTIONWhat Revo shaft are you using as a comparison? I'm guessing you are thinking of the 12.4mm one. it certainly has lover deflection than Cynergy. That beeing said why is deflection the only factor you'r looking at?
Look into cue shaft frequencies, and there is the last part of your quest. It is very important. A lot more than realised. Some have done shaft frequency testing and some shafts, both composite and wood can have a frequency that makes the tip hit the cue ball twice.12.4mm and my question is about deflection, do you known DEFLECTION
Yes I did reply to your question about deflection, my question why is that your only concern? Cynergy doesn't have especially low deflection. The ferrule material is also way to soft. I would say Revo is a better shaft in every way. I don't like the feel on either though, I rather use Ignite which have low deflection and great fit and finish, and good feedback.12.4mm and my question is about deflection, do you known DEFLECTION
Ok ok, the Revo have less deflection than the Cynergy and it's because you prefer the Ignite, incredible, I would have rather thought it was due to your favorite ice creamYes I did reply to your question about deflection, my question why is that your only concern? Cynergy doesn't have especially low deflection. The ferrule material is also way to soft. I would say Revo is a better shaft in every way. I don't like the feel on either though, I rather use Ignite which have low deflection and great fit and finish, and good feedback.
Whats weird is per my post above, I doubled the length of mine and it made no discernible difference. I guess the Tomahawk ferrule material is so light (or not dense) and it didn’t add much mass…?More ferrule/vault plate = more end mass = more deflection.
They are a gimmick to drive more sales for pool ... that is what you have to understandThere are people who have dissected carbon shafts to understand them better, they can find out more, end mass is just one factor, the rigidity is part of end mass equation too.
i am not a cuemakerWhat intrigues me is that the revo is considerably stiffer than the cynergy and i don't believe that only the end mass difference can make this difference of deflection