Actually it looks like a fullsplice to ME. Still FULLSPLICE construction, there is NO (A)joint. http://www.denalicues.com/cues_in_progress
The cue pic, as originally posted by Bob in his initial post absolutely does not look like a full splice cue....sorry, it just doesn't. The link you provided does not show this cue when I clicked on it. Just a group photo of a bunch of different cues in-progress, hanging. The question begs...would a prospective buyer even think to go beyond the initial pic(s) provided in the FS post, and look for more? Probably not. BTW...I never said that this particular cue had an A joint...rather I was explaining to another poster the difference between a full splice cue's construction, and that of a conversion cue...and when a full splice ceases to be a full splice.
I have received PM's from others agreeing with my initial statement...and it would certainly explain why the cue languished here for the better part of a year...even with it's more than reasonable price point. Had Bob posted up some of the in-progress pics with the sale ad...we would likely not even be having this conversation. As it stands...the cue looks like a wrapless conversion cue...period. It may be a full splice, but it does not LOOK like a full splice. And if you think it does, with the lone pic provided in this post, you need to educate yourself on the difference between what a wrapless full splice and a wrapless conversion cue typically LOOKS like.
There are lots of newer, or less savvy members who may not know the difference, or who will think that this is what a wrapless full splice is supposed to look like. They may go on to purchase similar looking cues, thinking that they are getting a full splice cue every time. There are a lot of folks that have no idea what the difference is between a short splice and a full/long splice cue....with regards to construction. Some don't care, some do.
Again...never said it wasn't a full splice...just said, from the pic provided HERE, it does not look like one...and I am standing by that statement.
Sent from my HTC One V using Tapatalk 4
Last edited: