Did the longer sets at smoking aces really tell us who the best players or are these results not much different than races to 9 or 11 would bare out
1
1
For this particular tournament...no.
Playing on bar boxes, no matter how long the race is, will not determine the better player. Kiamco beat Corey 21-5, and Shane beat Morra 21-2. That would never happen on a tougher table.
A longer race, such as a race to 100, simply tells you who was playing best at that time.
In order to find out who is better among two players, you have to first find a race length that can be completed in one session with minimal breaks, and without the players getting too fatigued.. Personally, I think that number is probably 30 to 50.
But, as I already mentioned, one lone race doesn't determine much.
If the players played one race every other day for a month, then I think at 15-16 races, you would have a really fair way of seeing who the better player was.
For obvious reason we can have races to 100 and even at that u bring endurance into play in which a highly skilled older player would be at a distant disadvantage
1