BCSanto, I am going to apologize in advance for helping the visibility of this thread in a...
lateral manner, but I sometimes allow some people to crawl right under my skin. It's a character flaw.
I for one find certain Schon cues to be among the best in value from a playability/quality/consistency standpoint where piloted steel jointed cues are desired. Good luck with the sale!
Now on with the highjacking!
duke@neo.rr.com said:
well then, you really need to word yourself better. you obviously NEVER had any kids to care for or watch over om a site like this...have ya'? haha would you want your child to see what you typed the time I told the moderator?...didn't think so.
When I raise my children, I can only hope they will understand the power of words and and ideas, and that each has it's place, and that none have an intrinsic moral value attached to them. Only actions can be judged in terms of right and wrong, or at least pleasure and pain, and even then on the most esoteric and theoretical of planes.
The fact of the matter is that you in your self-delusional role of caretaker to this forum and those who use it, chose to believe something about what I said or how I said it, without bothering to try and understand it, or find any value in it, simply because this is what you have been indoctrinated with in your experience of life, which points to a pathology marked by excessive fear and worry about control. Simply put, you fear that these words which you find so offensive as to grandiosely assume that I would be ashamed to use them in any context around my own children, will somehow cause you to lose control over a portion of your environment. Furthermore, your fear is so terrific that you went to great lengths to have the offensive locutions eradicated and me sternly and tersely warned into obedience by an equally officious and narrow-minded administrator, whom you knew all along agreed with your rigid self-aggrandizing and elitist outlook on life.
Somehow, in squelching my voice, you feel safer and more in control of a world, which somewhere buried deep inside of your tiny reptilian brain, you understand on the most basic of levels, is utterly chaotic, vast, remorseless, almost completely unknown, and perhaps even unknowable, yet if you were to process these horrifying thoughts in your fat cortex, where logic and reason are brighter, it would reveal too many of the dark squiggly squishy terrors of the true nature of yourself and the world you are so fortunate to inhabit, and there so far too traumatic for you to undertake; so you cover your senses with a blanket of belief and so-called faith to warm your cowering mind and to shield you from the big bad monster you only semi-consciously define as the unknown, but at heart which you truly believe is everywhere and everything.
Could I, I would pry open your blind eyes, because even your utterly worthless, putrid, broken shell of a terrified soul, (I only speak this in knowing that on some level, you understand that this is indeed the state of it), has some value. Unfortunately such a change of mental venue is requisite a journey of choice, so I am left with no choice save perhaps my own vainglorious attempt to influence, and otherwise to pity you and everyone like you.
P.S. The first part of your statement makes no sense when cast in reply to my previous comment. This is something one would say to someone whom they have misunderstood do to lack of written or verbal communication skills. Since the meaning my previous comment is quite plain, and the second part of your reply is more germane, even if only haphazardly, then I can safely assume you did not misunderstand me on that point. I only mention this out of some misguided hope that you will learn and correct such grammatical folly in future so as not to appear verbally retarded in the audience of those who may be more inclined to judge than I am, and in so saying, I am no different or better than you in many, or more probably, any respects.
P.P.S. Let me ask you this. Had I written in my originally disputed despicably filthy comment, "Someone throw that Bob Marley-wannabe person who engages in sexual congress with his female parent, out of here!", despite the fact that I would be misquoting, the phrase wouldn't have the same ring to it, carry the same weight, and that it would endanger the person at whom it was aimed from
getting it, and for whom it was a direct yet veiled reply, and therefore kind of an inside joke (to which you are admittedly NOT PRIVY), would you be any more comfortable having your kids read it? ...didn't think so.
