Cues can be both too light and too heavy. Think six ounces and six pounds. If you could somehow measure "goodness" of a cue for a particular player and plot goodness as you somehow varied the weight, there would be a weight where the goodness was largest. I expect that the neighboring weights of that best weight are going to be very nearly as good. I'd guess that if you changed the weight by an ounce you might change your percentage on some shots by a percent or two, and that difference might go away once you got used to the new weight.Does a heavier cue have an advantage over lighter cues, say 18 vs 19?
It's actually quite difficult to build a 12 oz, or even a 25 oz cue, for that matter.This has been argued over and over again here. Weight boils down to personal preference If weight made a difference we would all be using either 12oz or 25oz cues. But in the decades of people playing pool cues are still ranging in the 18-21oz range.
Who told you that?A lot of the Filipino style strokes that utilize gravity and the cue's momentum a lot more than a more muscle-driven stroke prefer a little heft to the cue as it provides them more feel and feedback.
... how the weight is distributed. ...
My personal experience is that how the cue is balanced is far more important than the weight for making the cue feel like it is part of my arm.... it can just as easily be a balance point thing ...
I have two vintage Adams cues. They weigh within tenths of ounces of each other, high 18oz. One has a metal joint on the butt, the other a plastic joint. As a result, the older Adam balance point is about 1.75 inches farther back compared to the one with the heavier metal joint.... it can just as easily be a balance point thing as I play this 'let the cue do the work' kind of style and my favorite cue is 17.5oz, severely back weighted. All my other cues I like are at least 19oz, with my heaviest fat wrap cue coming in just under 24oz. I absolutely hate the feeling of a forward weighted cue for my style of play.
The evidence that weight doesn't matter is that everybody uses cues in the 18-21 oz range?If weight made a difference we would all be using either 12oz or 25oz cues. But in the decades of people playing pool cues are still ranging in the 18-21oz range.
It's been done several times. Many break cues out their have that weight. Would I use it no.It's actually quite difficult to build a 12 oz, or even a 25 oz cue, for that matter.
Just sayin,,,,,,,,
I think my cue is around 16oz. Maybe approaching 17.My personal experience is that how the cue is balanced is far more important than the weight for making the cue feel like it is part of my arm.
I was referring to serious cuemakers and serious cues, different animal.It's been done several times. Many break cues out their have that weight. Would I use it no.
But building a playing cue with that weight can be quite easy. Try using a mid cue extension. I've seen the commercial one weigh about 4oz
I agree. I always preferred heavy cues but my fav is a 17.5oz severely back weighted cue.My personal experience is that how the cue is balanced is far more important than the weight for making the cue feel like it is part of my arm.
I have many Filipino friends.... I didnt teach this style to myselfWho told you that?
could be a style thing. if u have a loopy up and down component where you are playing aroumd with gravity and momentum, subtle differences in weight and balance will be obvious. if instead u have a classic snooker style with hand at the very back and cueing in contact with ur chin and chesti n contact with the cue ghats moving in a very linear fashion, you wouldnt notice a thing. at least thats been mentioned to me by plyrs that use that style.... i can barely remember back when yhat was my style too but even just messing around playing differently the cue seems to matter less when cueing that way. for my loopy style, some cues def make more suitable dance partners than others.I have two vintage Adams cues. They weigh within tenths of ounces of each other, high 18oz. One has a metal joint on the butt, the other a plastic joint. As a result, the older Adam balance point is about 1.75 inches farther back compared to the one with the heavier metal joint.
It seems to make a difference while holding the stick walking around the table; the metal joint cue feels heavier in my hand, even though the overall weight of the cue is the same. Kinda makes sense, though, because the "extra" weight is forward of where I'm usually carrying the cue.
Once down on the shot holding the cue in normal grip position, though, I notice very little difference. It very well could be that I'm simply not expert enough or sensitive enough to notice any difference.
I held Efren's cue once back when he was Caesar Morales --- the one that looked like a K-Mart special, and it felt about 18 oz to me, but hey, what do I know?I have many Filipino friends.... I didnt teach this style to myself
One of them was visiting family back home cpl years back and mentioned to me all the guys he played with there were in the 20+ oz range. Efren played a 21oz for a long time too as I recall.
Small sample to be sure but their preferences align with mine and to me a back weighted cue just feels better for that loopy style and heavy goes hand in hand with back balanced.
Could have as much to do with barnyard conditions and 5x10 tables I guess too but heavier cues were the overwhelming majority that he came across.
Pretty cool you got to meet him and hold his cue. Maybe that one was indeed 18oz. Maybe, since he was Cesar Morales about 40years ago, we can forgive you if you're memory is off by a few ouncesI held Efren's cue once back when he was Caesar Morales --- the one that looked like a K-Mart special, and it felt about 18 oz to me, but hey, what do I know?