I have one of the older entry-level Dynaspheres sets (I think it was called the Bronze series before they renamed everything), along with one of their red-dot cue balls because the original set only came with the single black-dot/triangle cue ball, and I prefer having more dots.
I've been really impressed with both the ball set and the cue ball. The quality and durability have been excellent. That red-dot cue ball has flown off the table onto a concrete floor more than a dozen times, and it's still perfectly fine. A quick clean and polish, and it looks brand new.
I can't access the Dynaspheres website right now, but looking at Seybert's, I see they now have 10+ pool ball sets and 5+ cue balls. Do they really need that many products?
I think the average buyer is just going to get confused. Serious home players will probably buy a mid- or high-end set anyway, while pool room owners may not know which model best fits their needs. They should take a lesson from Aramithâor even Microsoftâwhen it comes to product naming. Make it obvious who each product is for.
- Dynaspheres Pro Tour TV â Flagship set for TV, professional events, and tournaments. (Think Microsoft Windows Enterprise.) $300+
- Dynaspheres Poolroom Pro â Built for commercial pool rooms where durability is the priority. (Windows Business/Pro.) $200+
- Dynaspheres Home â A quality set for home table owners. (Windows Home.) $100+
Then offer three cue ball options that match those product tiers for players who want to experiment. Maybe 1 more Dynaspheres Basic ($49.99) â A budget set for casual players or decorative furniture-style pool tables that cost $10K+ lol.
One last thought: the moment Chinese manufacturers figure out how to market and sell directly to U.S. and European consumers with simple branding and distribution (They are already no. 1 of making products), it's going to be a game over for 99.99% of American and European companies.