Ekkes new billiard aiming system SAMBA

T

TomBoy

New member
(#1)
TomBoy
AzB Bronze Member

TomBoy is on a distinguished road

Status: Online
Posts: 1
vCash: 500
iTrader: 0 / 0%
Join Date: Jan 2014

Ekkes, new BIilliards instructional vidieo SAMBA - Today, 01:37 PM

I have recently purchased SAMBA from Ekkes. The developer of the See-System.
I am a user of the See-System and this system has improved my game. Players that I thought I could not beat are now easily beat. My positioning, banking, kicking and shot making ability has improve to the point that top players are complimenting my game.
As soon as Ekkes new system SAMBA was released, I purchased it. Ekkes has produced SAMBA, a comprehensive innovative approach to billiards that I feel simplifies and revolutizes the way a billiards player approaches any pool game they chose to play.
I strongly suggest that any billiards player who wants to improve their game and master the finer points of the game of billiards should purchase SAMBA.
Just one important tip you can use SAMBA to make combination shots you would only dream of trying. Just think of it, you spot a combo and now you have the means and the confidence to make that combo, not sellout and win the match. SAMBA also gives you the ability to make those hard bank shots and caroms no matter where they are on the table. Oh I almost forgot. For me cut shots of about 70* + degrees on the far end of the table are very makable. I also forgot to mention you can with SAMBA apply inside or out side English on all shots with confidence and results. The more you practice and apply Ekkes's SAMBA system the more your ability and confidence improves.

For more information
Search UTube and search out Ekkes, SEE-SYSTEM and Ekkes SAMBA.
Or go to his website:
www.infinite-billiards.com
TomsBoy
 
I'm still working on it. There's a bunch of info besides the system.

Ekkes touches all bases during his explanation of his method. He even explains simply how the dominant eye works for cuts left and right, and no, you aren't doing it right. :grin:

He gives a physical description for everything from your foot placement to your vision center alignment. Then you get to the actual aiming system. It covers, speed, spin, LD shafts, banking, combos, and videos explaining all categories.

Best,
Mike
 
Mikjary said:
I'm still working on it. There's a bunch of info besides the system.
Ekkes touches all bases during his explanation of his method. He even explains simply how the dominant eye works for cuts left and right, and no, you aren't doing it right. :grin:
He gives a physical description for everything from your foot placement to your vision center alignment. Then you get to the actual aiming system. It covers, speed, spin, LD shafts, banking, combos, and videos explaining all categories.
Best,
Mike
Click to expand...
If it's working for you, by golly, I say you better stick with it. (in spite of what the haters around this place say about systems)
I believe the word "system" is a misnomer. Better to be titled "Aiming Plan", in my opinion. The word "system" implies perfection, when actually only varying degrees of excellence are attainable. Just my 2 cents.
I personally shudder at the thought of trying to learn an additional method. As dumb as I am, it took me MONTHS to get in the groove with CTE. I don't need anything else and I hated the studying it took for me to 'get it'.
More power to you. :smile:
 
ENGLISH! said:
I for one am NOT a 'hater' as I do NOT 'hate' ANYONE.

Calling those that disagree with oneself a 'hater' is just a means of trying to 'demonizing' them & 'attacking' the character of the messenger instead of addressing the issue of disagreement.

It's a classic last ditch tactic when one realizes that the 'debate' is basically logically lost.

So... the side losing the 'debate' resorts to the tactic of 'attacking' the messenger as a mean of staving off the finality of the loss.

The attention is attempted to be misdirected away from the issue at hand in an attempt to put the focus in the personal realm regarding the other side, the 'winning' side.

The winning side does not do that, generally, as there is no need because they are winning the logical debate.

They may only do it in retaliation for 'attacks' made on them.

Best Wishes to ALL.
Click to expand...

What is this about lol
 
GoldenFlash said:
If it's working for you, by golly, I say you better stick with it. (in spite of what the haters around this place say about systems)
I believe the word "system" is a misnomer. Better to be titled "Aiming Plan", in my opinion. The word "system" implies perfection, when actually only varying degrees of excellence are attainable. Just my 2 cents.
I personally shudder at the thought of trying to learn an additional method. As dumb as I am, it took me MONTHS to get in the groove with CTE. I don't need anything else and I hated the studying it took for me to 'get it'.
More power to you. :smile:
Click to expand...

Thanks, I need all the power I can get! :thumbup:

The effects of learning these "systems" is cumulative. As a student of the game, each system starts to overlap with the others. I find it easier, the more systems you investigate, the next one makes more sense.

I've narrowed them all down to two categories...those relying on geometric principles and those relying on blended visual cues. The former is ghostball, fractional, double the distance, etc. The latter is CTE, stick aiming, 90/90, etc. To each his own.

SAMBA is nicely done and simple. Ekkes did a nice job on the presentation, too. He puts a lot of detail into his explanations and doesn't gloss over the basics. He repeats the message and it helps the listener to reinforce what he's teaching.

Best,
Mike
 
Mikjary said:
Thanks, I need all the power I can get! :thumbup:

The effects of learning these "systems" is cumulative. As a student of the game, each system starts to overlap with the others. I find it easier, the more systems you investigate, the next one makes more sense.

I've narrowed them all down to two categories...those relying on geometric principles and those relying on blended visual cues. The former is ghostball, fractional, double the distance, etc. The latter is CTE, stick aiming, 90/90, etc. To each his own.

SAMBA is nicely done and simple. Ekkes did a nice job on the presentation, too. He puts a lot of detail into his explanations and doesn't gloss over the basics. He repeats the message and it helps the listener to reinforce what he's teaching.

Best,
Mike
Click to expand...

Freddy "The Beard" and I corresponded at length about systems and both agreed that the more "systems" you knew the more confidence you had and the stronger your game became.

Can you imagine a sniper not knowing about windage, elevation and all of the other intricacies of aiming. Knowledge is power.
 
How does SAMBA compare with the SEE system? I have the SEE system but it seems Ekkes has abandoned that method of aiming for he is no longer selling it.
 
anbukev said:
How does SAMBA compare with the SEE system? I have the SEE system but it seems Ekkes has abandoned that method of aiming for he is no longer selling it.
Click to expand...

The SAMBA system is simpler and more of a point and shoot method. Ekkes does a really thorough job of explaining everything that goes into your shot (not just with SAMBA), but with all the parts of your aiming approach.

He teaches from the ground up and has some pretty sage instruction going on. I've never heard anyone talk about some of the things he deals with and how to solve dominant eye problems in your approach.

Best,
Mike
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top