watchez said:Billy-
Do you think that there are some players that never seem to bet their own $$ is because they can't handle the pressure? Or are they simply being 'good businessman' in having someone else take the financial risk but decreasing their own potential win level. It doesn't even have to come down to gambling, some players are always looking to get staked in tournaments as well. Does the same hold true in regards to pressure for them?
And then there are the players that are non-gamblers. They might be great tournament players but why is it that they won't gamble?? Is the pressure increased?
Watchez,I think all of your observations on this are true. The % of players not able to handle the added pressure of the money are certainly less than the players that can't economically afford to sponsor themselves in both tournament play, and money games. But then again those two categories are some what related aren't they? But there are players that can't handle the pressure and can afford to stake themself but just won't,but not many imo. And there are players that I feel that can handle the pressure and can afford to sponsor themself but rather have someone else do it. Something that I could never figure out. For instance,remember a guy by the name of Mark Trainer, he was the shady looking guy that wore sunglasses at the IPT events going around offering contracts to certain players. Well my point is this,take a player like Ralph Soquet. He dresses well ,he handles himself well,he manages well,and he certainly plays very well. Then why was it that he was willing to put himself under contract with Trainer? And there were other players as well that were contracted that I thought could afford to sponsor themselves.In regard to your question why certain players refuse to gamble ,one of the reasons might be that they feel gambling is beneath them, for legal reasons or their religion doesn't allow them. But that certainly doesn't make them a bad person,does it?But remember that this is only my opinion and not fact.