Now that Matchroom and WPA are in a proper war for players and event promoters, does anyone want to make predictions on how the WPA president can make billiards better again like when they got all the governments to pay prize money and create cue programs.
Pool has politics, but it is not elected politics. Its more like European politics where a lot of talking happens, then the person with money decides what to do and most people are not happy about it.
Its a new billiard world, players and promoters are talking. What is the ideal role for the WPA? This forum is the main driver in billiard happenings. Aside from new podcasts, I always thought AZB forum was like a news station of sorts with a chief.
Just saying the WPA is bad is not a transformational vision plan for how the players want the WPA to play a role in the billiard world.
I have been pushing for WPA to provide independent authority and delegate more powers to players. Specifically women players because women have not always been respected by all governments, including the USA. The WPA has to organize a female movement and pay and promote it.
Pool has politics, but it is not elected politics. Its more like European politics where a lot of talking happens, then the person with money decides what to do and most people are not happy about it.
Its a new billiard world, players and promoters are talking. What is the ideal role for the WPA? This forum is the main driver in billiard happenings. Aside from new podcasts, I always thought AZB forum was like a news station of sorts with a chief.
Just saying the WPA is bad is not a transformational vision plan for how the players want the WPA to play a role in the billiard world.
I have been pushing for WPA to provide independent authority and delegate more powers to players. Specifically women players because women have not always been respected by all governments, including the USA. The WPA has to organize a female movement and pay and promote it.