(Sorry, this is a little long)
So has anyone ever tried to send something back to Predator for repair under warranty?
I sent my cue (1996 1st Edition 314-5) to them a couple of weeks ago, and they called me a couple of days later to tell me that the flaws in my cue would not be covered under their "lifetime" warranty.
My cue has never been abused (even the girl from Predator said it appeared to be in very good condition). The problem with it is that the finish on the rings is peeling pretty badly and the inlays feel as though they are coming out. If you run your fingers down the butt you can feel the outline of the inlays.
She says that because the cue is 8 years old, that it is considered normal wear and tear - that if it had only been 2 or 3 years old, then it would have been covered under their "lifetime" warranty. Let me ask this: If something would be covered after 3 years, should it not also be covered after 20 if there is a LIFETIME warranty? And the thing of it is less than 2 months ago at a tournament I saw someone with the EXACT same cue and it was perfect - no bumps on the inlays, no peeling on the rings. I asked the guy and he never had it refinished or anything. So NO, it is NOT NORMAL wear and tear (IMHO). I have a 13 year old Viking that is still immaculate. I have owned several cues that have been at least as old yet not seen those problems. I have another Predator that's 6 years old and I don't have that problem.
After repeatedly voicing my dissappointment she said she would check with someone else to see if there is anything she could do. She called me back and said they would refinish the butt and shaft, re-ferrule and install a Moori and ship it back to me for $100 (regular cost to refinish the butt is $140).
So, after all of that, here is my question: Should I be happy with that or should I try to force them to honor their lifetime warranty? How could I go about it? I am now very sour on Predator because of this experience and will definitely re-consider my next cue purchase because of this.
Any advice or opinion from the cuemakers out there?
I am posting this for 2 reasons. First to hopefully get for help and advice on how to proceed. And secondly to warn people about Predator's refusal to honour warranties for older cues. I don't want to extort them or anything like that, but I don't want to see anyone invest $1000-$2000 with the understanding that they will have a cue that is warranted for life when in fact it isn't. It would just be nice to see them live up to their claim of a lifetime warranty. I have 3 Predators and 6 Predator shafts - This may sound corny, but I feel betrayed. I've been a loyal Predator customer for 8 years, spreading the gospel of their fine product (and warranty) to anyone who would listen, but now that it's their turn to incur a little expense for a loyal customer (who has spent a few thousand $$$ on their products), they don't want to honour their commitment...
From what I have said, does it seem to you as though it is in fact a manufacturer's defect? Any thoughts on how I could go about persuading them to reconsider?
So has anyone ever tried to send something back to Predator for repair under warranty?
I sent my cue (1996 1st Edition 314-5) to them a couple of weeks ago, and they called me a couple of days later to tell me that the flaws in my cue would not be covered under their "lifetime" warranty.
My cue has never been abused (even the girl from Predator said it appeared to be in very good condition). The problem with it is that the finish on the rings is peeling pretty badly and the inlays feel as though they are coming out. If you run your fingers down the butt you can feel the outline of the inlays.
She says that because the cue is 8 years old, that it is considered normal wear and tear - that if it had only been 2 or 3 years old, then it would have been covered under their "lifetime" warranty. Let me ask this: If something would be covered after 3 years, should it not also be covered after 20 if there is a LIFETIME warranty? And the thing of it is less than 2 months ago at a tournament I saw someone with the EXACT same cue and it was perfect - no bumps on the inlays, no peeling on the rings. I asked the guy and he never had it refinished or anything. So NO, it is NOT NORMAL wear and tear (IMHO). I have a 13 year old Viking that is still immaculate. I have owned several cues that have been at least as old yet not seen those problems. I have another Predator that's 6 years old and I don't have that problem.
After repeatedly voicing my dissappointment she said she would check with someone else to see if there is anything she could do. She called me back and said they would refinish the butt and shaft, re-ferrule and install a Moori and ship it back to me for $100 (regular cost to refinish the butt is $140).
So, after all of that, here is my question: Should I be happy with that or should I try to force them to honor their lifetime warranty? How could I go about it? I am now very sour on Predator because of this experience and will definitely re-consider my next cue purchase because of this.
Any advice or opinion from the cuemakers out there?
I am posting this for 2 reasons. First to hopefully get for help and advice on how to proceed. And secondly to warn people about Predator's refusal to honour warranties for older cues. I don't want to extort them or anything like that, but I don't want to see anyone invest $1000-$2000 with the understanding that they will have a cue that is warranted for life when in fact it isn't. It would just be nice to see them live up to their claim of a lifetime warranty. I have 3 Predators and 6 Predator shafts - This may sound corny, but I feel betrayed. I've been a loyal Predator customer for 8 years, spreading the gospel of their fine product (and warranty) to anyone who would listen, but now that it's their turn to incur a little expense for a loyal customer (who has spent a few thousand $$$ on their products), they don't want to honour their commitment...
From what I have said, does it seem to you as though it is in fact a manufacturer's defect? Any thoughts on how I could go about persuading them to reconsider?