I would presume it was me because for the past 3 years you have harassed me on every thread
I’ve posted wherein I recited, accurately as well, Dr. Dave’s assessment/ findings on pool chalks.
You seem to languish in the notion that being able to play without chalking regularly, rather than every shot,
or couple of shots vs. mere happenstance application, is some advantage. First of all pool is a mental
game before it gets played on the felt. Secondly, if you believe something to be true, even if it wasn’t, the
only thing of any consequence is what you believe, whether wrong, right or kind of right but not 100% right.
I purchased Blue Diamond chalk years ago because it was the cleanest chalk around. Heck, if I tried your
Soviet version, I might have stuck with that. But BD was less expensive and still is last time I checked & it
performs every bit as well as your brand. All my cues have ivory ferrules so chalk marks never happen but
some chalks throw off a lot of dust & so shaft discoloration is another consideration why I originally looked
for a higher grade chalk and just settled on BD. Like I wrote, every time I have posted about chalk and
referenced Dr. Dave, you made it a point to comment sarcastically about my remarks or just refute them.
Look, I am done with this. Just read Dr. Dave’s post #48 which directly cites my prior post about chalk.
He was attempting to stick to the facts, which you always had difficulty accepting perhaps for business
reasons. If you are a lackadaisical player when it comes to applying chalk, in other words you apply it
instinctively but not regularly or apply the chalk to your cue tip poorly, then a premium chalk seems to be
in your best interest. In that instance, I’d want the chalk that lasted the longest without being reapplied.
But I do not have that issue because I apply chalk correctly & after every shot so as Dr. Dave has stated
“Ain’t No Difference In Chalks”. Just read his article or maybe post #48 again but facts are facts...Nuf Ced!
I’ve posted wherein I recited, accurately as well, Dr. Dave’s assessment/ findings on pool chalks.
You seem to languish in the notion that being able to play without chalking regularly, rather than every shot,
or couple of shots vs. mere happenstance application, is some advantage. First of all pool is a mental
game before it gets played on the felt. Secondly, if you believe something to be true, even if it wasn’t, the
only thing of any consequence is what you believe, whether wrong, right or kind of right but not 100% right.
I purchased Blue Diamond chalk years ago because it was the cleanest chalk around. Heck, if I tried your
Soviet version, I might have stuck with that. But BD was less expensive and still is last time I checked & it
performs every bit as well as your brand. All my cues have ivory ferrules so chalk marks never happen but
some chalks throw off a lot of dust & so shaft discoloration is another consideration why I originally looked
for a higher grade chalk and just settled on BD. Like I wrote, every time I have posted about chalk and
referenced Dr. Dave, you made it a point to comment sarcastically about my remarks or just refute them.
Look, I am done with this. Just read Dr. Dave’s post #48 which directly cites my prior post about chalk.
He was attempting to stick to the facts, which you always had difficulty accepting perhaps for business
reasons. If you are a lackadaisical player when it comes to applying chalk, in other words you apply it
instinctively but not regularly or apply the chalk to your cue tip poorly, then a premium chalk seems to be
in your best interest. In that instance, I’d want the chalk that lasted the longest without being reapplied.
But I do not have that issue because I apply chalk correctly & after every shot so as Dr. Dave has stated
“Ain’t No Difference In Chalks”. Just read his article or maybe post #48 again but facts are facts...Nuf Ced!
