Hello everybody,
I played a game yesterday against a guy from the club, and the following shot came up: one object ball was frozen onto the long rail, very close to the side pocket, and my opponent called a safety and froze the cue ball onto that object ball, so that the line between the two balls was almost perpendicular to the long rail. No other shot was realistically available and I was trying to get out of a long string of safety shots because I was "getting cold".
So, what I did was play the shot by playing the cueball with full left english, ramming my cue VERY slowly into the cueball, effectively squeezing the object ball between the cueball and the rail, until the cueball popped to the right and into the pocket, leaving the cueball with a perfect shot.
Trouble is, my opponent cried foul, and argued that I couldn't play the cueball forward if it was frozen against the object ball. So I showed him the rules at http://www.wpa-pool.com/index.asp?content=rules_fouls#6.7 and he conceded that it might be possible to play frozen balls forward, but not against the rail, as the squeezing action necesarily implied that the cueball hit the object ball while in contact with the tip (duh...) but it couldn't be tolerated like if the path in front of the object ball had been clear.
So which is it? was my shot legal or not?
I played a game yesterday against a guy from the club, and the following shot came up: one object ball was frozen onto the long rail, very close to the side pocket, and my opponent called a safety and froze the cue ball onto that object ball, so that the line between the two balls was almost perpendicular to the long rail. No other shot was realistically available and I was trying to get out of a long string of safety shots because I was "getting cold".
So, what I did was play the shot by playing the cueball with full left english, ramming my cue VERY slowly into the cueball, effectively squeezing the object ball between the cueball and the rail, until the cueball popped to the right and into the pocket, leaving the cueball with a perfect shot.
Trouble is, my opponent cried foul, and argued that I couldn't play the cueball forward if it was frozen against the object ball. So I showed him the rules at http://www.wpa-pool.com/index.asp?content=rules_fouls#6.7 and he conceded that it might be possible to play frozen balls forward, but not against the rail, as the squeezing action necesarily implied that the cueball hit the object ball while in contact with the tip (duh...) but it couldn't be tolerated like if the path in front of the object ball had been clear.
So which is it? was my shot legal or not?