How to ruin a weekly tournament

Dedeye1209

AzB Silver Member
Silver Member
I have been around pool for 25 years, as a player, league (in house) and tournament director, and room manager. The One thing I have learned through all of these years is this: it is impossible to make everyone happy. Handicapping is quite possibly the hardest task a league coordinator or tournament director has. No one can agree on a given handicap for a given player. That is the short story.

The room that I frequent has two weekly tournaments. A Friday night double elimination, race to one 8 ball, and a Saturday afternoon nine ball tournament. Until today, it was an open tournament double elimination, race to 5 winners, to three loser side. The people who have been acting tournament directors have been working very hard to compile data for handicapping this tournament (none of these people are paid employees, all are volunteers, regulars at the room).

Today's attempt was sketchy at best. It is a $15 entry fee, with a break and run 10 ball for five dollars per chance. People have been complaining because the tournament has gone long a few times, with a claimed 1:00 PM start time we usually finish around 730, but I had seen it go as long as 930. We have eight available 9 foot diamond pro tables, and they rarely use more Than four of those. Attendance is usually around 20.

The first fail today came when it was announced that the tournament would now be single elimination to shorten the duration. None of the four "directors" ever want any suggestions or input, even from those who have years of experience in this arena (not only me). It is how it is, no input wanted or accepted. In one of The first matches today, the contestants were assigned the race and set in action. After nearly an hour of play the director came over and informed the competitors that he had instructed them incorrectly as to the length of the race and changed in the middle of the match. Myself and several others watching were outraged at this move. We all agreed that the correction should have been made after the match, and the director should I have taken accountability for his mistake. After this episode and the fail on the handicapping and other things, I heard at least a half a dozen people say they would not be back to this tournament.

The fellow who started the weekly event at the beginning of the summer rarely stays until the tournament is over. I volunteered to assist a couple of weeks ago, and this same fellow lost his first round of match, and promptly departed, leaving me in charge. With no thanks and very little help, I managed to finish The event by 730 with only one little mixup, easily corrected.

I am so frustrated by this, I will probably not be playing this event anymore. Until they get someone who has their you know what together, or figure out how to be consistent and accountable, and how to take suggestions and criticism with some grace.

Any thoughts?
 
Make it a shorter race open event in order to keep the the time under control. Race to 4 winners side and 3 on the losers side. Start it promptly at 1. If you want to handicap it, do it by entry A players pay 15, B players pay 10, C players pay 5.
 
This was a bad move because the winter months are coming and that is when pool halls get busy. It might best to suggest to keep it double elimination and the races 5 & 3. Usually the better players will always win a longer race.

If that doesn't go over well with the one who is supposed to be running the tournament then take your business elsewhere. I'm sure another bar or pool hall would love to have your business.
 
Sorry, in the race that got changed they were originally told was 9-7, changed to 8-6 I think. At this point, the race would have ended with no further play, the way the score stood at the time.

I would go elsewhere, but there really isn't anywhere else to go within reasonable distance. No other room with good tables, and I despise coin tables. I think the "bar box" has turned pocket billiards from a sport to a game, and taken much away from it. Trust me, if I had options, I would be exhausting them all.

I like the variable entry fee idea.

The time issue could be solved in a number of different ways. First and foremost, use all of the tables. That would shorten the tournament by two hours probably. The other thing, like you said, if the tournament is scheduled to start at one, make that be the start time. They have been too lenient in the tournament has not been starting before 145 since I ran it a few weeks ago. They have made it a delayed entry just to get more people, which I understand but they need to make it clear that The advertised start time is when the tournament will start. Period.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top