JB Cases said:Big deal. This is so 1990s. This was the cutting edge of Search Engine Optimization 15 years ago. It hasn't mattered in 15 years either. Back then it was paragraph #1 in SEO for dummies.
Google stopped counting meta tag keywords in 1996 - at least the SEO community is about 95% certain that meta tag keyword stuffing is useless.
But even at that there is not a web master/seo alive worth anything who doesn't sprinkle the websites that they design with competing brands to try and get keyword hits.
You sound like you know something about SEO. If so then you know that people rarely type a URL in a search engine and if they do it's almost 100% that that url will come up first on the SERPs. In google's case they just take you right to the website.
But what you really want to say is that it's unethical to put competitor's websites or brand names anywhere on a website for the purpose of getting noticed by web surfers? How so? It's just business. No different than Pepsi claiming to be better than Coke. I'd say that other websites should be putting IndyQ in their content to help them get hits as well if they aren't doing it already. If I were a dealer in high end cues I would put every cue maker's name on my website whether I actually had any in stock or not. This is business not charity.
Yes, Roy is GOOD PEOPLE, despite what you think of his SEO for Dummies practice of meta-tag stuffing.
The level of haters on these message boards is really depressing sometimes. Yeah, a caustic guy like Roy doesn't help when he is pissy about something but he's definitely straight up about how he feels, whether he is right or wrong. Anyway, you can say what you want but the guy is a stand up guy and if this is the best you can come with to attempt to assassinate his character I'd suggest you keep digging.
Yeah, I do know a little about SEO...well, actually quite a bit. That's not the point though, the intent of what he is trying to do is what I am pointing out.
Antiquated or not, it is still black hat behavior and I think most people would agree. Furthermore, I never said that I had a problem with him including any cuemaker names at all, just the inclusion of other dealers that are his competitors.
I don't think your analogy of Pepsi claiming to be better than Coke matches up. He isn't claiming to be better than the competitors I listed at all, he is just using their names to try and skim off of their search result hits. As far as being "just business", I guess we have a differing opinion on what is inappropriate and acceptable and what isn't. And no, I would not suggest the other dealers include IndyQ as part of their SEO strategy. Use your OWN content and rely on your OWN merits and let others do the same. I have dealt with quite a few of the other dealers on this forum and think they probably feel the same way.
We can also agree to disagree on the definition of GOOD PEOPLE - and that is fine. I am still pretty content with mine, so I will hold on to it for a bit longer. Call me a "Hater" if you want, all I did was point out a simple fact and identify it as unethical behavior. Pretty much the whole industry defines this as being unethical, even if you choose not to. Whether it works or not is a different discussion. You were mentioning Roy's honesty and integrity and that is completely your right. Carry on, please. I am just providing a little more insight and think that prospective cue buyers and other dealers are entitled to know about the bigger picture - that's my right.