IndyQ Labor Day Sale

JB Cases said:
Big deal. This is so 1990s. This was the cutting edge of Search Engine Optimization 15 years ago. It hasn't mattered in 15 years either. Back then it was paragraph #1 in SEO for dummies.

Google stopped counting meta tag keywords in 1996 - at least the SEO community is about 95% certain that meta tag keyword stuffing is useless.

But even at that there is not a web master/seo alive worth anything who doesn't sprinkle the websites that they design with competing brands to try and get keyword hits.

You sound like you know something about SEO. If so then you know that people rarely type a URL in a search engine and if they do it's almost 100% that that url will come up first on the SERPs. In google's case they just take you right to the website.

But what you really want to say is that it's unethical to put competitor's websites or brand names anywhere on a website for the purpose of getting noticed by web surfers? How so? It's just business. No different than Pepsi claiming to be better than Coke. I'd say that other websites should be putting IndyQ in their content to help them get hits as well if they aren't doing it already. If I were a dealer in high end cues I would put every cue maker's name on my website whether I actually had any in stock or not. This is business not charity.

Yes, Roy is GOOD PEOPLE, despite what you think of his SEO for Dummies practice of meta-tag stuffing.

The level of haters on these message boards is really depressing sometimes. Yeah, a caustic guy like Roy doesn't help when he is pissy about something but he's definitely straight up about how he feels, whether he is right or wrong. Anyway, you can say what you want but the guy is a stand up guy and if this is the best you can come with to attempt to assassinate his character I'd suggest you keep digging.



Yeah, I do know a little about SEO...well, actually quite a bit. That's not the point though, the intent of what he is trying to do is what I am pointing out.
Antiquated or not, it is still black hat behavior and I think most people would agree. Furthermore, I never said that I had a problem with him including any cuemaker names at all, just the inclusion of other dealers that are his competitors.

I don't think your analogy of Pepsi claiming to be better than Coke matches up. He isn't claiming to be better than the competitors I listed at all, he is just using their names to try and skim off of their search result hits. As far as being "just business", I guess we have a differing opinion on what is inappropriate and acceptable and what isn't. And no, I would not suggest the other dealers include IndyQ as part of their SEO strategy. Use your OWN content and rely on your OWN merits and let others do the same. I have dealt with quite a few of the other dealers on this forum and think they probably feel the same way.

We can also agree to disagree on the definition of GOOD PEOPLE - and that is fine. I am still pretty content with mine, so I will hold on to it for a bit longer. Call me a "Hater" if you want, all I did was point out a simple fact and identify it as unethical behavior. Pretty much the whole industry defines this as being unethical, even if you choose not to. Whether it works or not is a different discussion. You were mentioning Roy's honesty and integrity and that is completely your right. Carry on, please. I am just providing a little more insight and think that prospective cue buyers and other dealers are entitled to know about the bigger picture - that's my right.
 
Roy is sharp as a tack and

Light years ahead of his time. When it comes to advertising and using tools at his disposal where most peoples minds end his begins.
He is a buisnessman with a giant business. I might add self made.We all should be so lucky.
When most peeople were selling cues out of suite cases Roy was not. He was building his business. I wish I was worth just what his database has to be worth. And I aint exactly poor.
Nick :)
 
marknyc said:
Yeah, I do know a little about SEO...well, actually quite a bit. That's not the point though, the intent of what he is trying to do is what I am pointing out.
Antiquated or not, it is still black hat behavior and I think most people would agree. Furthermore, I never said that I had a problem with him including any cuemaker names at all, just the inclusion of other dealers that are his competitors.

I don't think your analogy of Pepsi claiming to be better than Coke matches up. He isn't claiming to be better than the competitors I listed at all, he is just using their names to try and skim off of their search result hits. As far as being "just business", I guess we have a differing opinion on what is inappropriate and acceptable and what isn't. And no, I would not suggest the other dealers include IndyQ as part of their SEO strategy. Use your OWN content and rely on your OWN merits and let others do the same. I have dealt with quite a few of the other dealers on this forum and think they probably feel the same way.

We can also agree to disagree on the definition of GOOD PEOPLE - and that is fine. I am still pretty content with mine, so I will hold on to it for a bit longer. Call me a "Hater" if you want, all I did was point out a simple fact and identify it as unethical behavior. Pretty much the whole industry defines this as being unethical, even if you choose not to. Whether it works or not is a different discussion. You were mentioning Roy's honesty and integrity and that is completely your right. Carry on, please. I am just providing a little more insight and think that prospective cue buyers and other dealers are entitled to know about the bigger picture - that's my right.

I see your point. You did however have a problem with the cue maker names as you made a point to say that he has "Erik Lee Cues" in the meta tags.

We will just disagree then about whether it's unethical to include a competitor's name in your content.

The bigger picture is this, Roy has been in business for 15 years. He has a huge customer base which includes some of the world's largest collectors. A man doesn't get to the point he is at in this business without being a stand up person. The business of high end cues is just too small a world for someone to get by for so long if he were screwing people over.

You dig up something that he PROBABLY did in the mid 90s when he was building his website and that was the prevailing wisdom of the time. I would bet he hasn't changed those meta tags for a decade and has completely forgotten about them. If not then I would expect him to put all the new cue dealer competitor's websites in there. In the last five years there are several new dealers of high end cues as well as plenty of WAY more popular websites selling pool equipment. Why hasn't Roy stuffed all these into the meta tags if he is sooooo unethical?

Another thing is that you don't even know how those things got there. For all you know some clueless web designer stuffed those keywords in there because he thought it was the way to go at the time and Roy has no clue that they are even there. At least you make the ASSUMPTION that HE did it and that he knows about it.

You know full well that the vast majority of business owners that have websites have no clue what the code looks like or even what a meta tag is. So I find it highly disingenuous that you would seek to discredit a man with so weak an argument when you can't possibly know if Roy himself put them there or even knows about them.

So listen up potential cue buyers. Roy Mallot's website has the names of some other businesses in the industry in the meta tags. Some people feel that this is not right to have these names in the meta tags. This has a direct bearing on whether Roy Mallot is fit to sell you a cue or not. Can you see the correlation dear cue buyer?

From now on it is suggested that before you purchase a cue from any dealer you should have a qualified Search Engine Optimizer check the code on the website for any "black hat" seo techniques. If they find any then by all means don't purchase a cue from those unethical jerks.

While you are at it Mark, can you list the other dealers in the billiard industry who are trying to game the search engine's algo? I have a pretty good list of websites complete with their SEO profiles and what they are doing. I am sure that people would like you to continue and let us know which websites are "ethical" and which ones aren't. I'd be interested to see if you come up with the names on my list.

In the past they called this kind of reporting muckraking.
 
Last day.
bumpthread.gif
 
Back
Top