Originally Posted by Cornerman
In case you didn't know Joe, this is very similar to Hal Houle's method. Same basic idea as far a breaking the cueball up into sections and aiming that section line to the object ball center or edge. Hal starts with just three total cueball lines (left 1/4, center, right quarter) aiming to the center or edge of the object ball. That 1/4 line on the cueball is what he's refered to the edge of the "small ball," an imaginary circle 1/2 a ball diameter (1/4 ball to the edge).
Like what you've describe with CJ and whoever wrote the "Ultimate Aiming System," I've added a few more sections, and by adding sections, it's always two at a time (left and right) until I stopped adding points because there seemed to be enough.
Fred
I was in the thread about Joe Tucker's aiming method & intending to make a post about the Numbers & the possibilities that they present to put into play, when I stumbled onto this.
Is the part that I enlarged, put in bold, & put in blue that which is of the 'secret code' for that other 3 letter acronym aiming method.
Is this what is meant when I've heard it said 'inner edge'?
If so... I think it redefines the ongoing debate to many of us.
Yes, I did not get the Pro1 DVD after my intrigue & 'hope' was killed by the 3 & 5 ball You Tube Videos on 'perception'.
But one would think that something this significant would have been brought out during the many 'discussion debates' over the course of much time that they have raged on & would have been pointed out with all of the hub bub.
Does 'it" have two edges, the outer edge & the "inner edge"...
and the subjective 'edges' in between.
If so... many wheels have been spun wasting much time.
Also the explanation of aligning deviding lines of the cue ball to just the center or edge of the object ball is what CJ Wiley has in one of his DVDs but with more division lines on the CB.
I would very much like this thread to not spiral down the cesspool of hypocritical personal attacks that have been running rampant as of late.
So... I would ask Management to keep a tight rein on this thread.
If you have something on topic, then please participate...
BUT... if you have nothing on topic or feel that you must add personal 'attacks', then please refrain from participating in this thread?
I know that I am being naive, but I can hope.
In case you didn't know Joe, this is very similar to Hal Houle's method. Same basic idea as far a breaking the cueball up into sections and aiming that section line to the object ball center or edge. Hal starts with just three total cueball lines (left 1/4, center, right quarter) aiming to the center or edge of the object ball. That 1/4 line on the cueball is what he's refered to the edge of the "small ball," an imaginary circle 1/2 a ball diameter (1/4 ball to the edge).
Like what you've describe with CJ and whoever wrote the "Ultimate Aiming System," I've added a few more sections, and by adding sections, it's always two at a time (left and right) until I stopped adding points because there seemed to be enough.
Fred
I was in the thread about Joe Tucker's aiming method & intending to make a post about the Numbers & the possibilities that they present to put into play, when I stumbled onto this.
Is the part that I enlarged, put in bold, & put in blue that which is of the 'secret code' for that other 3 letter acronym aiming method.
Is this what is meant when I've heard it said 'inner edge'?
If so... I think it redefines the ongoing debate to many of us.
Yes, I did not get the Pro1 DVD after my intrigue & 'hope' was killed by the 3 & 5 ball You Tube Videos on 'perception'.
But one would think that something this significant would have been brought out during the many 'discussion debates' over the course of much time that they have raged on & would have been pointed out with all of the hub bub.
Does 'it" have two edges, the outer edge & the "inner edge"...
and the subjective 'edges' in between.
If so... many wheels have been spun wasting much time.
Also the explanation of aligning deviding lines of the cue ball to just the center or edge of the object ball is what CJ Wiley has in one of his DVDs but with more division lines on the CB.
I would very much like this thread to not spiral down the cesspool of hypocritical personal attacks that have been running rampant as of late.
So... I would ask Management to keep a tight rein on this thread.
If you have something on topic, then please participate...
BUT... if you have nothing on topic or feel that you must add personal 'attacks', then please refrain from participating in this thread?
I know that I am being naive, but I can hope.
Last edited: