The illegal trading of ivory is horrible and really should be forcefully discouraged.
Ca enacted stringent laws & so have several states; import & export is also banned.
However, the genuine irony is that cue-makers do not use illegal ivory; all of it is pre-ban 1978.
When was the last time, or better yet, when was any cue-maker charged with using illegal ivory?
Now Ernie G. was charged with breaking the Federal law prohibiting the export of ivory products.
He made cues using ivory, the buyers were from overseas & he knew where the cues were bound.
The ivory used in those cues, and I submit ivory used in basically all pool cues, is pre-ban 1978.
That's ivory forty (40) years old at the miniumum and likely a whole lot older so how does this ivory
contribute to the illegal traffic in poached ivory? There is no correlation whatsoever & remember, this
is "legal" ivory already here in the USA. Unfortunately, I reside in a state prohibiting the use of ivory.
Any cue-maker that does not reside in a state that restricts the use of ivory, and every cue buyer that
also doesn't reside in a restrictive state, is entitled to build and own pool cues that uses pre-ban ivory.
And as you've read from some of the posts, ivory makes a very unique pool cue ferrule & cue joint too.
Ergo, this does not increase the demand for poached ivory because all the ivory used in pool cues is legal
and until someone identifies a USA cue-maker building cues using poached ivory, there isn't any cause.