StraitishShoote
Dad's Rack Boy
Hello,
I've been doing some reading lately about LD shafts and the different ones on the market. One thing I read stated that reducing the tip diameter helped decrease deflection more efficiently than coring out a shaft and replacing with a less dense material. In my head this makes sense, and I realize most LD shafts on the market do both from what I've seen.
What I'm wondering is, generally how would a regular maple or laminated shaft at a small diameter of say 11 or 11.5mm compare to a LD shaft of a larger more standard diameter (12.75-13mm). I know it will be hard to answer this exactly but wondering if a reagular/laminated shaft that's almost 2mm thinner than a thicker LD shaft that's been cored somehow would be similar in deflection reduction.
Just realized I wrote more than I planned.
Thanks for you thoughts,
Nathan
I've been doing some reading lately about LD shafts and the different ones on the market. One thing I read stated that reducing the tip diameter helped decrease deflection more efficiently than coring out a shaft and replacing with a less dense material. In my head this makes sense, and I realize most LD shafts on the market do both from what I've seen.
What I'm wondering is, generally how would a regular maple or laminated shaft at a small diameter of say 11 or 11.5mm compare to a LD shaft of a larger more standard diameter (12.75-13mm). I know it will be hard to answer this exactly but wondering if a reagular/laminated shaft that's almost 2mm thinner than a thicker LD shaft that's been cored somehow would be similar in deflection reduction.
Just realized I wrote more than I planned.
Thanks for you thoughts,
Nathan