Yes Lou, you and Patrick are far better at making snide remarks and ridiculing forum posters than I am but I try to respond to your efforts as best I can.
JoeyA
You have become that which you hate.
Lou Figueroa
Yes Lou, you and Patrick are far better at making snide remarks and ridiculing forum posters than I am but I try to respond to your efforts as best I can.
JoeyA
Hahahaha. The naysayers will probably accuse me of contributing to the mistreatment of puppies now. Louie will probably say that Michael Vick and I are good buddies.![]()
Bingo.
No, Double Bingo!
Yep.All the lines and edges are immaterial. What is happening is that instead of waving their cue sticks all around in the air -- differently each time they come to the table -- players attempting to employ this system are now approaching the table -- not only in a more consistent manner -- but online with the CB. And they are paying attention, maybe for the first time, and really looking at the CB and OB. From there their feel and intuition take over and they make the small incremental adjustments to try and pocket balls That's why people see improved performance -- they are already on a line that is close *but not exact.*
Lou Figueroa
If anyone is noticing, after years of spiteful demogoguery, the Naysayers are reversing their tune. Now they are preaching to each other about how nice CTE/Pro One is, how it helps this one and that one and how they like this and especially like that.
That's sweet girls.
CTE/Pro One has overcome even the naysayers.
Lawdie, lawdie, who'd ever thought they'd see this day?
Glad to see you preaching the Gospel girls. I'm all done.
but suffice it to say that no real good has come out of any of this, save for his own self-agrandizement. )
Yep.
I agree the "aimpoint line" is window dressing, but I like the center-to-edge line as a fixed reference. I like center-to-contact point even better.
pj
chgo
I think this should be the Official CTE Description (OCD).There are only 5 lines of aim and not 6 and a grand total of 9, if you dont count the straight in twice and not 11.
As far as I can tell, there's only one line of aim: from the bridge point through the cue ball center. The other lines would be more appropriately called "alignment" lines, because their purpose is to get you aligned correctly for finding the bridge point.
Pivoting is needed only because the cue tip is deliberately pointed away from the center of the cue ball, and as far as I can tell that's done to help you find the bridge point, also. That certainly doesn't fit what I think of as "aiming". I imagine that people who use CTE/ProOne a lot - e.g., the Shuffetts, Stevie Moore - wouldn't have much trouble finding the bridge point with the cue unscrewed and in its case.
By the way, I've been playing with Mike Page's robot. Fun toy. I'm pretty sure it can be programmed to use CTE/ProOne without using any information not available to the player or not readily used by the player.
This is wrong and alot of people forget about the forgotten point, the back hand, the grip hand.
This point also has to be in the right line.
Any system that does not take into account that the cue is a line is not a complete system. The two point the matter on the cue is the bridge and the grip hand and these points must be included in the aiming process.
If anyone is noticing, after years of spiteful demogoguery, the Naysayers are reversing their tune. Now they are preaching to each other about how nice CTE/Pro One is, how it helps this one and that one and how they like this and especially like that.
That's sweet girls.
CTE/Pro One has overcome even the naysayers.
Lawdie, lawdie, who'd ever thought they'd see this day?
Glad to see you preaching the Gospel girls. I'm all done.