Actually it is a very GOOD way to measure the speed of the cue ball (agreed, at the point where it leaves the 'table'). If the table and ground are both nicely 'horizontal' (as compared to gravity), the calculation does not involve the measurement of time, rather you measure distance (the time unit enters the equation as the accelleration due to gravity). My guess (too lazy to do the calculations) is that you can achieve a higher degree of precision measuring the distance. What I mean is, when measuring the distance you should be able to achieve +- 1mm or so. This would equate to a very small time measurement to get the same speed measurement, perhaps in the 1000ths of seconds (again, I did not run the numbers). You might need to know the precise accelleration due to gravity at the table, it will vary a bit from place to place. I am inclined to believe that this method could be more accurate and precise than a radar gun, especially a cheap or uncalibrated unit, but would want to do a bit more research before placing a wager.