Please fill me in, as one, my view has not changed... and two, you posting to a thread that was started in 2013.
Jamie <---- confused again :scratchhead:
New Forum Style : some info
- Thread starter jpparmentier
- Start date
Please fill me in, as one, my view has not changed... and two, you posting to a thread that was started in 2013.
Jamie <---- confused again :scratchhead:
Please fill me in, as one, my view has not changed... and two, you posting to a thread that was started in 2013.
Jamie <---- confused again :scratchhead:
Yeah, really. There must be something in the water today. lol :thumbup:
Since you can select the "style" you want to view this place in, this is a kind of a silly non-issue at best. I prefer the vB 3 style myself and Tapatalk on the phone. Take a look at the bottom left hand corner of your screen in the page footer.
I having been using the vB 4 style...
The Vew Format
The new format should use different colors and fonts standardization for subject headings. The options for display on the new site leaves much to be desired.
It's very hard to peruse the site using speed reading of a page which I'd imagine most of us do. The background and border colors do not adequately contrast
nor highlight the headings and especially, the standard ones on the page that should be in a entirely different color and shade.
These light blues & grays are a poor match and the arrangement style of the information and the columns looks like a 6 column Excel spreadsheet with an expanded
middle column utilizing text rather than numbers. I posted on this thread because I thought it was a new topic as I went straight to the last page and there were Azers
expressing opinions.
In any event, we're discussing it now and let's be candid, the owners needs to hear this stuff. I think the new format gets a D grade and I hope the owners decide it's
back to the drawing boards. I have been a big supporter of Az and in fact, was the person that created the slogan......."AZ Gold Memberships Cost <10 Cents per Day"
And I have been a Gold Member and hope to again become one some day but not until the Forum starts spending money to fix this website......even the for sale section
has become boring and I don't visit it nearly as much as before......I betcha cue sales attributable to Az are down and for obviously understandable reasons too.
I know things had to change but the Forum didn't get it right this time. Maybe the next version will better because this one gets a "D" grade....the prior was at least a "C+".
The new format should use different colors and fonts standardization for subject headings. The options for display on the new site leaves much to be desired.
It's very hard to peruse the site using speed reading of a page which I'd imagine most of us do. The background and border colors do not adequately contrast
nor highlight the headings and especially, the standard ones on the page that should be in a entirely different color and shade.
These light blues & grays are a poor match and the arrangement style of the information and the columns looks like a 6 column Excel spreadsheet with an expanded
middle column utilizing text rather than numbers. I posted on this thread because I thought it was a new topic as I went straight to the last page and there were Azers
expressing opinions.
In any event, we're discussing it now and let's be candid, the owners needs to hear this stuff. I think the new format gets a D grade and I hope the owners decide it's
back to the drawing boards. I have been a big supporter of Az and in fact, was the person that created the slogan......."AZ Gold Memberships Cost <10 Cents per Day"
And I have been a Gold Member and hope to again become one some day but not until the Forum starts spending money to fix this website......even the for sale section
has become boring and I don't visit it nearly as much as before......I betcha cue sales attributable to Az are down and for obviously understandable reasons too.
I know things had to change but the Forum didn't get it right this time. Maybe the next version will better because this one gets a "D" grade....the prior was at least a "C+".
Last edited: