mikepage said:There's a lot of good stuff in that book to be sure...
But...
this guy wants to get the fundamentals right first.
So, imo, first study some of the other stuff mentioned long enough that you won't be thrown off by,
-- the picture showing as "wrong" a player getting low on the cue as virtually every player right now at the DCC does
--the picture showing lots of elbow drop in the follow through
--the suggestions that sidespin makes a ball curve
--the direction to hit a ball and rail at the same time to run a ball down the rail
--the claim that with an elevated cue and right sidespin, the ball first swerves left and then swerves right
Those are just a few off the top of my head
with all due respect..
yes .. the fundamentals and physics.. are inaccurate.. but it's 30 year old data...
the book did not have the benefit of the Jacksonville Experiments.. but it was the best available theory for the time..
the first 25 pages. represent they best they had 30 years ago..and most of it is still relevant....
the remaining 195 pages however.. are spot on ...
its not the few details they had wrong .. its the vast majority they got right that is impressive...
name another 30 year old technical manual.. that is still 90% relevant...
good lasts today... great lasts forever...
99 critical shots is a GREAT book... IMO