New video on Propoolvideo.com

I think Earl was still upset from his match with Saez. When he goes to break in the 2nd or 3rd game, he makes a comment about how he lost his last match to the jump cue. He absolutely hates jump cues. And then when Coery fouled, he blurted out "FOUL!" and Corey got a little upset.

Southpaw
 
That was strange that Corey conceded that one game so early, I guess he was just frustrated.

I never realized conceding could be considered sharking or against the rules, I thought it was doing a favor for the other guy.
 
JoeyA said:
Some tournaments penalize the loser if they rake the balls with the loss of that game plus the loss of another.

Not letting your opponent shoot an easy layout of a few balls does deny them the opportunity to stay in stroke, but I don't see that when you have only one ball hung in the hole.

Once I was playing in a nine ball Senior's tour tournament in Florida with a fellow by the name of Rick Bingham from Kentucky. I was struggling with my game and a bit frustrated with my level of play and while we were trading games back and forth and even at about 3/3, I jarred the nine ball, left it sitting on edge of the pocket and the cue was in the middle of the table and I said, "That's good Rick" and racked the next rack without letting Rick shoot the hung nine ball. Ricky showed me what class is when after I racked and before he broke, he walked over to me and discreetly and quietly told me that one of the rules in this tournament was that you can't concede any balls and that if you do, you lose not only that game but another as well. He confided that he just wanted to make sure I knew about the rule so no one else could call it on me. He made sure the tournament director nor anyone else was listening. I later confirmed what he said to be true and he will always have my admiration and respect as to how a gentleman should conduct himself.

On the other hand, I had a professional player call a foul on me recently when I was attempting to break a nine ball rack, when my cue tip touched the cue ball and moved it three inches forward of the headstring. IMHO, while it was the rule for that tournament, it wasn't a very classy move on the pros part, especially when he was playing a lowly amateur like myself. Pro's name will not be mentioned here as it woudn't benefit anyone.
JoeyA

P.S. I saw Corey rake the balls during the set as well when he didn't get shape on the 6 ball or maybe it was the five.


HEY JOEY......I was playing a few tourneys with Rick when I was 15-16 years old and his son as well......You are right he is a good guy. He still plays some of our tourneys here in TN from time to time as we are only about an hour and a half from him. You dont see to many people that will tell you a rule and not call the foul on you :D Esp. when it cost him a legal game.
 
Brickman said:
HEY JOEY......I was playing a few tourneys with Rick when I was 15-16 years old and his son as well......You are right he is a good guy. He still plays some of our tourneys here in TN from time to time as we are only about an hour and a half from him. You dont see to many people that will tell you a rule and not call the foul on you :D Esp. when it cost him a legal game.

If you see Rick Bingham, you tell him (and especially his son) that he is not only a class act but his example lives on. Sons need to know what kind of man OTHER people think their dad is.

JoeyA (BTW, he still beat me, I think 9-7, but it has been a while)
 
I watched the video when it was put on the website a week ago, and yea i wasnt sure what the bickering was all about between Earl and Cory, but it was interesting, cuz earl got pissed the one game and conceded and then so did cory after he missed shape on the 5 or 6 ball.

And then it seemed anytime someone missed with 2 or 3 balls on the table the game was conceded.

isnt it BCA or WPA rules that if you rake the balls + one more game too.
 
bigskyjake said:
man, Earl's crazier than a shithouse rat
he's got his chopped off cue and his "high impact-gyration reducing elbow puff, it's guaranteed to ward off rheumatism and evil spirits or your money back":D

God I laughed so hard I now have to leave and change my underwear.


Nick
 
conceding

I almost didn't put this match up because of all the conceding. But I see now that Corey's and Earl's antics actually add to the entertainment value. But I agree with unknownpro. It *is* a sharking tactic, especially when more than 1 ball is raked.

There used to be a rule on the Florida Tour that penalized you one game for conceding ANY balls. After this match I went to the TD, John DiToro, and asked him to tell the players to shoot every ball. There was no conceding in the final match.

Now, I'm not sure if I did the right thing, from a purely entertainment point-of-view.

So, what do you all think? Let the players do as they please and capture the ensuing fireworks? Or, stick to the rules?
 
Let it be- It's only Earl that ever concedes more than a hanger.

Personally i wish i could get sharked like that every game (in competition).
 
So, what do you all think? Let the players do as they please and capture the ensuing fireworks? Or, stick to the rules?[/QUOTE]



The players should be required pocket every single ball and their opponent should not interfere with that requirement.

Tournament directors or promoters should not be in the business of changing the basic rules of pool, IMHO.

JoeyA
 
Back
Top