No More Anonymous Forum Flaming....

Brickman said:
New law says No flaming or annoying, unless a person uses their real name!!!!

what do you guys think?


http://news.com.com/Create+an+e-annoyance%2C+go+to+jail/2010-1028_3-6022491.html
i don't think it's neccesary or practical to use their real name. but i defintely agree that aliases need to be cleaned up and could easily be done for the most part. if people couldnt use an alias to attack someone while leaving their regular user name spotless i think it would cut down tremendously on the amount of flaming and make this a much more peaceful and informational forum.

jeff
 
Brickman said:
New law says No flaming or annoying, unless a person uses their real name!!!!

what do you guys think?


http://news.com.com/Create+an+e-annoyance%2C+go+to+jail/2010-1028_3-6022491.html
As stated elsewhere:

Uh, try again. Maybe you guys should read the text of the bill... this is a wildly inaccurate interpretation of the bill, in which the word "annoy" appears not once. The word "annoy" appears in *existing* legislation (Communications Act of 1934) and it does not include any communication a recipient might find annoying. Furthermore, the identity provision is not specified in the amendment discussed. Your article is, indeed, a joke.
 
Back
Top