Not sure what matchroom rules are, but what I think should happen is the person that shouted it should be escorted out and the opponent get the option of ball in hand.What would happen if someone in the stands had said” he is playing the wrong ball “ loud enough for the player to hear?
HmmmNot sure what matchroom rules are, but what I think should happen is the person that shouted it should be escorted out and the opponent get the option of ball in hand.
That makes no sense. Just like you shouldn't be punished for my actions (if I rob a bank and use some of that money to pay you for something should you then have to go to jail for my bank robbery that you weren't aware of and had nothing to do with?), a player also shouldn't be punished for the actions of some audience member either.Not sure what matchroom rules are, but what I think should happen is the person that shouted it should be escorted out and the opponent get the option of ball in hand.
I see your point about the player not being punished for the actions of a random spectator.That makes no sense. Just like you shouldn't be punished for my actions (if I rob a bank and use some of that money to pay you for something should you then have to go to jail for my bank robbery that you weren't aware of and had nothing to do with?), a player also shouldn't be punished for the actions of some audience member either.
I agree that you should escort the offending audience member out and ban them from the event and maybe even consider giving them a lifetime ban from all of that promoter's events if you feel it is warranted since they are the offending party and it is a pretty big offense, but play should continue as it was since you have no way of truly knowing if the player even benefited from the shouted advice, but whether they did or not, they can't and shouldn't be punished for somebody else's actions that they had no participation in or control of.
This does indeed get a bit more touchy but to be considered coaching I think there would need to be some evidence that the player solicited it, encouraged it, was aware that their friend or family member was going to do something like that and did not tell them not to or otherwise try to discourage it, etc, before the player could be held accountable for it otherwise I can't see how/why they should be held accountable for somebody else's actions, even somebody they know, if they had no participation in it or control over it. Same thing though, that offending audience member should be escorted out and banned even if it is a player's spouse, parent, child, or friend.Now if it was the players spouse or teammate things could get interesting and could possibly be considered coaching.
That makes no sense. Just like you shouldn't be punished for my actions (if I rob a bank and use some of that money to pay you for something should you then have to go to jail for my bank robbery that you weren't aware of and had nothing to do with?), a player also shouldn't be punished for the actions of some audience member either.
I agree that you should escort the offending audience member out and ban them from the event and maybe even consider giving them a lifetime ban from all of that promoter's events if you feel it is warranted since they are the offending party and it is a pretty big offense, but play should continue as it was since you have no way of truly knowing if the player even benefited from the shouted advice, but whether they did or not, they can't and shouldn't be punished for somebody else's actions that they had no participation in or control of.
Not exactly flawed because if the person didn't know the money was stolen, and there is no reason they should have known the money was stolen, they aren't held accountable and punished for the crime in any way, same as the player shouldn't be held accountable and punished for somebody else's actions. If provably stolen money gets returned to its rightful owner that isn't the receiver getting punished for the thief's crime, it's just the return of stolen property to its owner, but if the opponent is given ball in hand the player is in fact actually being punished (it wasn't a stolen cue ball being returned or anything lol).If you are paid with traceable stolen money, the money is confiscated. Your example is flawed.
Have big LED panel with game status including which ball and what color along with the voice of Ms Big Brother announcing shit.
BCA instructors need to get on situational comprehension.i think bonus ball actually had that, and the players still shot at the wrong holes or in wrong order.
Pink is only good for one thing.let’s get everyone to shoot the balls in the familiar order, yellow blue red purple orange green….until the rebellion is successful and these damn brits get the message
wait where does pink go?
7/15?