What do you think is the relationship between being able to win a game of Pool and being able to win a verbal argument? Most people have an instinctive negative reaction to a player who wins and then brags about it at the loser's expense, whereas most people instinctively applaud a player who is considered a "good" loser or winner.
So what, if any, difference does it make if you can beat someone or not? Does this give you a license to verbally beat them up whenever you can? Do the loser's opinions' all become instantly invalid. If so if they were to win in the future would they all become valid again and the other player's opinions become suddenly irrelevant? If the loser happens to believe the sky is blue does it suddenly turn whatever color the winner thinks it is when the last ball goes down?
So what, if any, difference does it make if you can beat someone or not? Does this give you a license to verbally beat them up whenever you can? Do the loser's opinions' all become instantly invalid. If so if they were to win in the future would they all become valid again and the other player's opinions become suddenly irrelevant? If the loser happens to believe the sky is blue does it suddenly turn whatever color the winner thinks it is when the last ball goes down?