Paul:
I can certainly understand jump cues. In fact, if I see someone even attempt to use one in a game of straight pool or one hole, "I'd like to play him/her some." (You know what I mean.)
Jump cues have no place in straight pool or one hole. Unlike rotation games (where there is one and only one object ball on the table at any given time), straight pool and one pocket have multiple object balls -- there should NEVER be a need to have to jump over a ball -- it's just plain silly.
However, cue extenders? Really? How does this device "detract" from the spirit of the game? In fact, using a cue extender with any kind of skill can be challenging in itself, since often, one has to use a very long open bridge (probably very close to the joint) and has to concentrate on maintaining a straight stroke under these adverse conditions. Is a mechanical bridge better under these conditions? Probably. I'll admit, I keep a cue extender in my case. But I also admit I'm a switch-hitter, and don't use the cue extender all that often (seldom, in fact). The only times I have to use it, would be when I have a tough cut shot down table, about middle diamond, cue ball on the center line of the table, shooting towards that middle diamond (where it doesn't matter if I'm shooting righty or lefty -- it's too far "into" the middle of the table). Once in a great while, I'll pull the cue extender out for this purpose if I don't have to shoot over a ball. If I do have to shoot over a ball, I'll use the mechanical bridge. I have a little bit of a snooker background, so I'm quite adept at using the mechanical bridge. But I'll admit, I have greater speed control with the cue extender, because the cue is contacting my hand -- greater opportunity for "feel."
Anyway, that's my thoughts on this. I disagree with disallowing cue extenders, since cue extenders *are* allowed in the great game of snooker, and you'll see them used all the time by the greats -- oftentimes in tandem with mechanical bridges. I just don't see the harm in them -- how in the world do they "detract" from the game?
-Sean
Well said Sean. I'll agree that we disagree.
When I execute a "move" in 1 pocket that requires my opponent to either stretch out or use the bridge I've accomplished my goal. When they take out the cue extension to gain the few inches needed to neutralize my move, it cheapens the entire strategy of one pocket. I liken it to using a computer to count cards (Blackjack). All the skill needed to either shoot opposite handed or with the bridge was eliminated for $29.95 + S&H.
Paul