Curious, why do you think a change should be considered?Variable: amount of penalty points awarded for a foul/penalty varies depending on the situation.
Fixed: amount of penalty points awarded for a foul/penalty is the same for all fouls and penalties.
For the curious, the Wikipedia page on Snooker can be found here.
I'm not necessarily saying that a change should be considered in snooker, except maybe some simplifications of the rules that maintain fairness (foul and a miss is particularly problematic fairness-wise). I mainly put this poll out so that I could make the penalty values in my own variant of snooker, Snookerpool, more fair. I decided to fix the issue by just using the highest of either four points or the value of the highest valued ball that is hit first by the cue ball.Curious, why do you think a change should be considered?
The penalty value is fine as it is. I think the real problem with the game is the foul and a miss rule, especially for ametuers.The only thing that needs fixing is that when a red(s) is potted on a foul shot the penalty should be 8 for each red potted.
Once you get used to the scoring system it isn't too bad. The real problem is how the pros handle fouls (particularly foul and a miss).Counting in snooker is too complicated. Its more complicated than scoring in scrabble (american board game).
I think American Snooker rules solves all your problems.The penalty value is fine as it is. I think the real problem with the game is the foul and a miss rule, especially for ametuers.
I thought so too at first (at least the fixed penalty value). but Swighey had some good points (message #2).I think American Snooker rules solves all your problems.