The website is playpool.com
And in the playpool.com downloads section there is an excel spreadsheet that calculates tournament payouts. Its called playpoolcalcs.xls. I highly recommend people download it and give it a try.
Besides calculating tourney payouts, it also creates round robin schedules (for up to 50 teams, great for setting up leagues) and estimates how long a single and double elimination tournament will take depending on the number of players and tables available.
Now to address your question I would say your payouts look O.K., but I see some things that I would change. See my discussion below for how I like to see payouts created. It was from a 2001 post to rec.sport.billiard.
By the way, I have a fair amount of experience running tournaments as I ran probably 200 Billiard Congress of Wisconsin tournaments including 7 state championships.
------------------------------------------
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: "Ed Mercier" <emerc...@execpc.com>
1. The money in a given position should never be any more than double the money in the next lowest position.
2. The lowest paid spot should return at least the players entry fee.
3. In general roughly 1/4 of the field should get in the money. In our
tournaments we tend to payout"up to 1/4 of the field." What I mean is if
there were 54 players in a double eliminationtournamentwe wouldpayout12
spots. We wouldn'tpayoutone more position (13 - 16th) because 16 is
greater than 1/4 of 54.
4. A person should never have to play another match once they can no
longer win thetournament. What this means is if you are playing a single
elimination tournament, 3rd and 4th place should be the same money. They should never be asked to playoff to see who ended up in 3rd, and who ended up in 4th.
5. Once you are in the cash, every additional win should be worth more
money than the last win. In other words the payouts should go up by a
greater dollar amount as you get further along in thetournament.
Lastly, when we run tournaments, we create a tournament payoutchart ahead of time, that includes all thepayoutamounts for the full range of players that we expect to show up. It makes it very easy when questions arise to just point at the pre-prepared sheet and say, "see, with 54 players, here are the payouts..." Maybe the player still won't agree that thepayout makes sense, but they can't accuse you of trying to pull a fast one on anybody.