Quadrant aiming

(((Satori)))

AzB Silver Member
Silver Member
Quadrant aiming is a name that I made up to describe a way that I "aim." Gve it a try and see if you like it.

The goal of quadrant aiming is to zero in on the contact point. Once you know where the contact point precisely is it is easy to visualize the shot from there. So you locate the contact point and from there you have the tangent line, the ghostball location etc. and everyone knows this but it is taught that locating one of the 360 ticks (precise contact point) is hard when I dont think it is. Try this method and see if it becomes easier.

Quadrant aiming refers to concentrating on one quadrant of the object ball and narrowing the contact point down from there. The quadrants on the object ball are front left, front right, back left, and back right. The front and back halves are divided by an imaginary line parallel to the foot and head rail and the right and left halves are divided by an imaginary line parallel to the side rails. No matter where the object ball is on the table the quadrants will stay the same. No matter where the cueball is in relation to the object ball, the quadrants on the objectball will always stay the same. Now lets move on.

Now on any normal shot there is only one quadrant of the objectball that you will need to focus on. For instance, if you are going to pocket the shot in the lower left corner then your contact point is going to be somewhere in the front right quadrant. Get the idea? Now to narrow the quadrant down even further imagine this. If you are shooting into the lower left corner you can imagine a line from the corner to the side pocket. If the object ball rests on that line then the contact point is going to be precisely in the middle of the front right quadrant. If the object ball rests to the right of the imaginary line then the contact point will be on the right side of the quadrant in equal proportions and the opposite is also true. With practice it is easy to see precisely where the correct contact point is no matter where it rests on the table or if the shot is a straight in shot, a cut to the left, a cut to the right, a backwards cut, it doesnt matter... the contact point will be easy to find by looking within the correct quadrant based on the pocket chosen and narrowing the precise point of contact within the quadrant down proportionately to where the objectball is resting on the table.

Once you narrow in on the precise contact point you simply shoot the cueball to hit it... much like playing baseball and picking a location on the plate that you want to throw to if you are pitching. In baseball you pick the location and you throw it... in pool you pick the contact spot and you hit it.

Give it a try and let me know if it works for you.
 
Last edited:
One more word of warning. Do not overcomplicate things by worrying which part of your cueball has to hit the spot. Your brain will adjust the details for you. Simply determine the spot, focus on the spot, and hit it. Tell yoursef that you are going to hit the spot with the cueball. Dont worry about lining up etc. Just do it.
 
What do you use the rear quadrants for? A kick from the rail beneath the ob? Wouldn't a shot aimed at the rear of the ob be a greater than 90-degree cut?

I'm not seeking to criticize you but am trying to understand you.

Thanks.
 
The reason I mentioned the rear quadrants was because I was just trying to describe the quadrants as best as I could so that it would be easier to understand. You are right. You will never shoot at the back of the ball.

The main point I wanted to get across is that the quadrant of the objectball is a smaller version of the same shape on the table if you were to use the side rail and end rail and imagine a 1/4 circle going from one rail to the other through where the objectball rests. The location of the objectball within that circle is the location of the contact point within that quadrant. I hope this makes sense.
 
One more word of warning. Do not overcomplicate things by worrying which part of your cueball has to hit the spot. Your brain will adjust the details for you. Simply determine the spot, focus on the spot, and hit it. Tell yoursef that you are going to hit the spot with the cueball. Dont worry about lining up etc. Just do it.
This is similar in principle to Joe Tucker's "Aiming By Numbers" system (I think that's what it's called). Here's an old article by Bob Jewett about that: http://www.saluc.com/html/billiard/pdf/tucker_system.pdf

Hope this doesn't sidetrack your thread...

pj
chgo
 
This is similar in principle to Joe Tucker's "Aiming By Numbers" system (I think that's what it's called). Here's an old article by Bob Jewett about that: http://www.saluc.com/html/billiard/pdf/tucker_system.pdf

Hope this doesn't sidetrack your thread...

pj
chgo

I was going to point out the SAME thing. It is the same thing by a different name almost.

The whole "aiming" thing is blurry because I think almost everyone who can aim and make a ball is doing almost the same thing in their "mind" and just don't "real eyes" it. That is why there is a million different systems to accommodate the million different people who do the same thing and can't explain it in the same "language" where everyone can understand it.

If you can make a ball consistently, you don't need an aiming system...you ALREADY have one.
 
I see the similarities in that Joe uses the quadrant. I think he basically uses parralel to determine which number to hit right? Im talking about matching the contact point to the position on the table. Similar but different imo.
 
I see the similarities in that Joe uses the quadrant. I think he basically uses parralel to determine which number to hit right? Im talking about matching the contact point to the position on the table. Similar but different imo.
I agree it's a very different and creative slant on it.

And yes, I think Joe's system is also similar to "parallel" aiming.

pj
chgo
 
Back
Top