Replacing K66 cushions, any reason to not get Accu-Fast?

[tjlmbklr]

I am restoring a table, actually more like making a halfway decent table I got for free into something I can be proud of and happy to have in my house. I had an Olhausen in the past and liked how well the rails responded and the fact they give lifetime warranty makes me wonder if I should just get them or a standard K66 rail cushion.

Thoughts?

 

[Stealthimage_r]

If your table that you are restoring uses k66 profile then definitely go with accufast cushions. You won't regret it.

Sent from my SM-G965U1 using Tapatalk

 

[tjlmbklr]

If your table that you are restoring uses k66 profile then definitely go with accufast cushions. You won't regret it.

Sent from my SM-G965U1 using Tapatalk

This is my thought too. If I am going through all this work I want to keep it for life.

Thanks! :thumbup:

 

[Lawnboy77]

If your table that you are restoring uses k66 profile then definitely go with accufast cushions. You won't regret it.

Sent from my SM-G965U1 using Tapatalk

I agree! It would be a toss up between the Artemis K-66 and Accu-fast, and the Artemis are crazy expensive for any table that isn't a commercial. I briefly thought about having my Anniversary redone with Artemis K-66 since one of the great mechanics around here once told me that the old Monarch Super-speeds on the original Anniversaries were actually K-66 profile, but I decided to go with the K-55 Artemis. No regrets, the Artemis K-55 rock!, so I'm pretty sure their K-66 would be very comparable.