Round 2 Winning Percentage

[CebuanoNiNoy]

Name Total Win Lost Win%

1. Deuel, Corey 100 70 30 70%
2. Morris, Rodney 92 64 28 69.57%
3. Bustamante, Francisco 105 72 33 68.57%
4. Ortmann, Oliver 101 68 33 67.33%
5. Boyes, Karl 107 72 35 67.29%
6. Immonen, Mika 107 72 35 67.29%
7. Reyes, Efren 99 66 33 66.67%
8. Nevel, Larry 104 68 36 65.38%
9. Appleton, Darren 101 66 35 65.35%
10. Hill, Michael 112 72 40 64.29%
11. Drago, Tony 109 70 39 64.22%
12. Orcollo, Dennis 106 68 38 64.15%
13. Harriman, Danny 100 64 36 64%
14. Souquet, Ralf 104 66 38 63.46%
15. Feijen, Niels 108 68 40 62.96%
16. Engert, Thomas 99 62 37 62.63%
17. Van den Berg, Nick 114 71 43 62.28%
18. Petroni, Fabio 111 69 42 62.16%
19. Melling, Chris 108 67 41 62.04%
20. Moore, Steve 106 65 41 61.32%
21. Alcano, Ronato 103 63 40 61.17%
22. Hundal, Raj 109 66 43 60.55%
23. Davies, Ben 116 70 46 60.34%
24. Owen, Gabriel 120 72 48 60%
25. Tot, Sandor 104 62 42 59.62%
26. Montal, Edwin 108 64 44 59.26%
27. Davis, Michael 104 61 43 58.65%
28. Diks, Rico 111 65 46 58.56%
29. Pagulayan, Alex 103 60 43 58.25%
30. Peach, Daryl 109 63 46 57.8%
31. Varner, Nick 109 63 46 57.8%
32. Jungo, Dimitri 111 64 47 57.66%
33. Mckenna, Robert 111 64 47 57.66%
34. Miller, Jason 107 61 46 57.01%
35. Majid, Imran 102 58 44 56.86%
36. Alcaide, David 111 63 48 56.76%
37. Williams, Charles 106 60 46 56.6%
38. Beaufils, Yannick 108 61 47 56.48%
39. Dominguez, Ernesto 108 61 47 56.48%
40. Shaw, Jayson 110 62 48 56.36%
41. Lohtander, Marko 112 63 49 56.25%
42. Lining, Antonio 118 66 52 55.93%
43. Kazuo, Furuta 115 64 51 55.65%
44. Lely, Alex 115 64 51 55.65%
45. Schmidt, Michael 117 65 52 55.56%
46. Gallego, Ramil 112 62 50 55.36%
47. Daulton, Shannon 114 63 51 55.26%
48. Hann, Quinten 105 58 47 55.24%
49. Luat, Rodolfo 105 58 47 55.24%
50. Parica, Jose 96 53 43 55.21%
51. Kirkwood, Jason 122 66 56 54.1%
52. Walden, James 112 60 52 53.57%
53. Archer, Johnny 116 62 54 53.45%
54. Matlock, David 105 56 49 53.33%
55. Hsia, Hui-Kai 117 62 55 52.99%
56. Robles, Tony 117 62 55 52.99%
57. Bryant, Charles 107 56 51 52.34%
58. Kaplan, Joern 105 53 52 50.48%
59. Chu, Hung Ming 115 58 57 50.43%
60. Chohan, Tony 106 50 56 47.17%

There is definitely a big change compared to the last round.
Alcano for example from No. 1 goes down to 21 and meanwhile
Corey Deuel from No. 27 goes uppppp to No. 1.

 

[recoveryjones]

No doubt those percentage points are important.Thanks for the great stats.
RJ

 

[wahcheck]

amount of payout?

Name Total Win Lost Win%

1. Deuel, Corey 100 70 30 70%
2. Morris, Rodney 92 64 28 69.57%
3. Bustamante, Francisco 105 72 33 68.57%
4. Ortmann, Oliver 101 68 33 67.33%
5. Boyes, Karl 107 72 35 67.29%
6. Immonen, Mika 107 72 35 67.29%
7. Reyes, Efren 99 66 33 66.67%
8. Nevel, Larry 104 68 36 65.38%
9. Appleton, Darren 101 66 35 65.35%
10. Hill, Michael 112 72 40 64.29%
11. Drago, Tony 109 70 39 64.22%
12. Orcollo, Dennis 106 68 38 64.15%
13. Harriman, Danny 100 64 36 64%
14. Souquet, Ralf 104 66 38 63.46%
15. Feijen, Niels 108 68 40 62.96%
16. Engert, Thomas 99 62 37 62.63%
17. Van den Berg, Nick 114 71 43 62.28%
18. Petroni, Fabio 111 69 42 62.16%
19. Melling, Chris 108 67 41 62.04%
20. Moore, Steve 106 65 41 61.32%
21. Alcano, Ronato 103 63 40 61.17%
22. Hundal, Raj 109 66 43 60.55%
23. Davies, Ben 116 70 46 60.34%
24. Owen, Gabriel 120 72 48 60%
25. Tot, Sandor 104 62 42 59.62%
26. Montal, Edwin 108 64 44 59.26%
27. Davis, Michael 104 61 43 58.65%
28. Diks, Rico 111 65 46 58.56%
29. Pagulayan, Alex 103 60 43 58.25%
30. Peach, Daryl 109 63 46 57.8%
31. Varner, Nick 109 63 46 57.8%
32. Jungo, Dimitri 111 64 47 57.66%
33. Mckenna, Robert 111 64 47 57.66%
34. Miller, Jason 107 61 46 57.01%
35. Majid, Imran 102 58 44 56.86%
36. Alcaide, David 111 63 48 56.76%
37. Williams, Charles 106 60 46 56.6%
38. Beaufils, Yannick 108 61 47 56.48%
39. Dominguez, Ernesto 108 61 47 56.48%
40. Shaw, Jayson 110 62 48 56.36%
41. Lohtander, Marko 112 63 49 56.25%
42. Lining, Antonio 118 66 52 55.93%
43. Kazuo, Furuta 115 64 51 55.65%
44. Lely, Alex 115 64 51 55.65%
45. Schmidt, Michael 117 65 52 55.56%
46. Gallego, Ramil 112 62 50 55.36%
47. Daulton, Shannon 114 63 51 55.26%
48. Hann, Quinten 105 58 47 55.24%
49. Luat, Rodolfo 105 58 47 55.24%
50. Parica, Jose 96 53 43 55.21%
51. Kirkwood, Jason 122 66 56 54.1%
52. Walden, James 112 60 52 53.57%
53. Archer, Johnny 116 62 54 53.45%
54. Matlock, David 105 56 49 53.33%
55. Hsia, Hui-Kai 117 62 55 52.99%
56. Robles, Tony 117 62 55 52.99%
57. Bryant, Charles 107 56 51 52.34%
58. Kaplan, Joern 105 53 52 50.48%
59. Chu, Hung Ming 115 58 57 50.43%
60. Chohan, Tony 106 50 56 47.17%

There is definitely a big change compared to the last round.
Alcano for example from No. 1 goes down to 21 and meanwhile
Corey Deuel from No. 27 goes uppppp to No. 1.

Are these rankings directly related to the rankings showing amount of payouts for each respective placing?

 

[CebuanoNiNoy]

Are these rankings directly related to the rankings showing amount of payouts for each respective placing?

I think not, since if you are out next round (say Round 3) your placing here will not matter, you will have the same positioning as the one who has lower or higher percentage (say 61st to 120th have the same payout anyway). However during the last round, wherein only six will remain winning % would definitely matter for placing, especially for 3rd to 6th place. Secondly winning % will be very useful (as RJ points out) in the next round especially if the scoring of your group is tight and in case of same number of wins and losses (say 3-2) winning % will be the bases.

 

[recoveryjones]

Those winning percentages will be very important for tommorows sessions.In groups of five, each player must play 4 matches.The guy at the bottom of the heap (percentage wise)will most likely have to win 3 out of 4 matches just to survive.Meanwhile the group percentage leader may get by with 2 wins in a tiebreaker.
RJ

 

[wahcheck]

winning % = $$$$$

I think not, since if you are out next round (say Round 3) your placing here will not matter, you will have the same positioning as the one who has lower or higher percentage (say 61st to 120th have the same payout anyway). However during the last round, wherein only six will remain winning % would definitely matter for placing, especially for 3rd to 6th place. Secondly winning % will be very useful (as RJ points out) in the next round especially if the scoring of your group is tight and in case of same number of wins and losses (say 3-2) winning % will be the bases.

Seems to me it does have a direct relationship, since there are only 60 players remaining and payouts from 1-60 vary.........check again and tell me if I'm wrong......even if you are out next round, your higher winning pct. will put you dollars ahead of those with a lesser winning pct.....no?

 

[CebuanoNiNoy]

Seems to me it does have a direct relationship, since there are only 60 players remaining and payouts from 1-60 vary.........check again and tell me if I'm wrong......even if you are out next round, your higher winning pct. will put you dollars ahead of those with a lesser winning pct.....no?

There is no direct relationship between winning percentage and payout.
Check the last payout of the last IPT last July
http://www.internationalpooltour.com/ipt_content/stats_rankings/default.asp

As i have mentioned only Rank 1 to 6 will have varied payouts, other than
that 7th to 18th place has the same payouts (30K), 19th to 36th has the same (17K) and so on..

 

[wahcheck]

There is no direct relationship between winning percentage and payout.
Check the last payout of the last IPT last July
http://www.internationalpooltour.com/ipt_content/stats_rankings/default.asp

As i have mentioned only Rank 1 to 6 will have varied payouts, other than
that 7th to 18th place has the same payouts (30K), 19th to 36th has the same (17K) and so on..

Please check new prize money payout in threads above and on IPT website.....

 

[CebuanoNiNoy]

Please check new prize money payout in threads above and on IPT website.....

I stand corrected on this one wacheck, i have seen TheOne's posting on this one on the other thread. But i dont know still if the winning % will be followed or the scoring first (3-2 for example will have priority over a player with 2-3) before winning percentage.