ajrack said:The main reason the game was changed to "one foul"...
during the Jansco STARDUST AND JOHNSON CITY tourneys back in the 70's..the 9ball game was race to 11...two shot shoot out...the games were taking too long so The Janscos changed the rules to "one foul ball in hand"
..which at the time was called "vegas rules". But the game was also changed to race to 9 and alternate breaks, so the games did speed up a little.
I say 1 miss ball in hand worked out best for women and TV, as women tend to rely more on safeties to get ball in hand than not and they have more visual appeal than the men. People aren't there just for pool, they are there to see the show. Did you watch the Apprentice when the women beat the men every time they used sex to market their product? The bottom line for me, is the impact it had on the original game and never confuse the two. Its like comparing original 1 pocket and changing it to 1 foul ball in hand. They ruined the 9ball, they might as well ruin 1 pocket as well. What do you think it would do to snooker? They did it just so they could incorporate their 1 pocket moves into the 9ball and benefit from it before it caught on. The trickle down effect on the main strategy is that everyone shoots 9ball like a pool pussy now, trying to get ball in hand. I was thinking that that would be a good name for the women's tour but the more I think about it, it should be for a men’s tour. The PPA.
you just keep thinkin Butch.... .. canwin