Run This (38)

bluepepper said:
Nice easy pattern.

Wei makes it look easy. If only I could do that on a table without getting hopelessly out of line...
 
tsw_521 said:
Wei makes it look easy. If only I could do that on a table without getting hopelessly out of line...

True. By the way, has anyone else noticed how nicely circular the resting positions are of the cueball now are? Nice improvement Wei.
 
The only thing is, I'd probably go about the first 4 shots like this: (Very little cue ball movement needed.)

CueTable Help


Here's another possible pattern. These balls are kind of all over the place, so the cue ball has to travel a bit. You might need to throw the 8 a little if the 5 is in the way (or better yet, choose a different pattern).

CueTable Help

 
Ooh that's tight Dan. I'd be afraid to go that way. If you don't get perfect on the 8 you have little insurance. I do like the way you did the first 4 balls of the other pattern.

Here's one that although it has some cueball travel, shouldn't get into trouble, because the shot off the 4 is aimed to a zone of 2 or three shots. If I go long I have the 5 or 8. If I come up short I have the 6 to get on the 3,5, or 8. The 2-cushion route to the 1 ball is natural and the 1-ball key ball lies in an area where you almost have to get a decent angle on the break ball.

CueTable Help

 
Well, since no one else has went this way...

Since no one else has went this way... just don't be too harsh on the new guy. Not too much cue ball movement except from the 5 to the 9.

CueTable Help



Mark
 
Another option. 6-draw over a little and shoot the 8 and 5 in the same pocket,3,4,7,1,9. 3 to 4 is a little touchey.
 
Bluesteel said:
Since no one else has went this way... just don't be too harsh on the new guy. Not too much cue ball movement except from the 5 to the 9.

CueTable Help



Mark

thats actually a great pattern IMO and the first one that popped into my head as well.....and if you draw the ball on the breaker theres virtually no way to scratch in the corner. It's also very easy to complete.

G.
 
Gerry said:
thats actually a great pattern IMO and the first one that popped into my head as well.....and if you draw the ball on the breaker theres virtually no way to scratch in the corner. It's also very easy to complete.

G.

I agree. The only thing I see that may not be likely is to hold up the cueball on the first two shots exactly as they're drawn. I think the shot off of the 6-ball may drift a little further and leave a slightly more difficult cut on the 2-ball which may then have to be bounced off of the side rail. But I still think the sequence would work.

Edit: Maybe I'm seeing the angles wrong on the cuetable on this one. It looks to me if you cheat the pocket maybe you can hold the cueball for the 6. I don't know. The 2-ball looks a little harder to hold than the 6. But maybe cushions are not necessary.
 
Last edited:
Deadon said:
Another option. 6-draw over a little and shoot the 8 and 5 in the same pocket,3,4,7,1,9. 3 to 4 is a little touchey.

I don't think the 3 to the 4 is too tough. I'm picturing it coming off of the side rail to the center of the table. As long as snookering behind the 9 is avoided, no matter where you end up up table off of the 4 you have the 7.
Nice.
 
bluepepper said:
Ooh that's tight Dan. I'd be afraid to go that way. If you don't get perfect on the 8 you have little insurance. I do like the way you did the first 4 balls of the other pattern.

I know, I know. It's a bit tight, but I'm pretty sure I could park the cue ball on the rail plus or minus a couple of inches. My first pattern was to draw off the six for the 3, then get the 5 and 8, but following to the rail seemed easier than forcing position with a longish draw to get to the 3.
 
Back
Top