No one here is arguing that the CF shafts make the player better.
The endless string of "arrow and indian" type comments is tiresome.
Someone please quote the post in this thread in which it is posted that they are now running more racks with the CF than they ever could with their old maple shaft.
Everyone who has made those comments is free to come to TN and I'll play you with my CF shaft, then my solid maple shaft.
I'll bet the scores will be nearly identical in the long run.
The point CF users have been making has been consistent, but tragically flying well over your heads every single time.
To the contrary, the OP must own a lumberyard because most of his content is about wood being better than CF.
Never said wood was better than cf. Ever.
I only point out that cf ISN'T better. Not the holy grail.
They (any ld of either) both play just as good as their user.
I only preach that cf isn't going to make a player better.
But any ld shaft definitely helps make shooting easier imo.
If I had a dollar for every idiot that went straight from a high-deflection maple shaft to a low-deflection cf shaft and then told me "it's the cf that makes the difference...."
It's not the shaft's MATERIAL that makes you better dumass, it's the low-deflection.
My wood, $360 Vantage shaft has the same low-deflection as my (tried for 6 months) $500 12.9 Revo (now my break shaft).
I shoot better with my wood Vantage.
AGAIN, IT'S THE LD PROPERTIES OF THE NEW SHAFTS, NOT THE MATERIAL, THAT IS MAKING THESE BAR-BANGING IDIOTS BETTER!!!!!