Shane WINS
- Thread starter cashin
- Start date
Repeat please respond
Scott Frost has the nads,skills, and the backing. He has lost in tar to shane before, but he is the only one with the 'heart' to step up and has beaten SVB before on long races not on TAR. maybe mix in a bar box, 9 ball, 10 ball, and one pocket 25 games each.
CAN YOU DIG IT.
After this night Mika is still great, he is just not a true blooded huster. Husters grind, fight, kick, scrap, and do whatever necessary even if it takes hours and your game is off and you gotta grind a little. Lots of Pros can win tourneys, but a race to 100 is the best format to lay it all on the line and bring out the true essence of the great game of pool.
Scott Frost has the nads,skills, and the backing. He has lost in tar to shane before, but he is the only one with the 'heart' to step up and has beaten SVB before on long races not on TAR. maybe mix in a bar box, 9 ball, 10 ball, and one pocket 25 games each.
CAN YOU DIG IT.
After this night Mika is still great, he is just not a true blooded huster. Husters grind, fight, kick, scrap, and do whatever necessary even if it takes hours and your game is off and you gotta grind a little. Lots of Pros can win tourneys, but a race to 100 is the best format to lay it all on the line and bring out the true essence of the great game of pool.
It's true that at this level, especially these two players can beat anyone in the world when they are on. But I feel like after a thumping like this there is a little less mystery about who the downright favorite is
I would say Shane is at least a 2-1 favorite against Mika in this format.
Svb lover the money and plays a hella better for it .. I asked him In Ga this year . Action is in his Blood. Mika is a great guy ,but for the cash it's hard when you do gamble..
If they had a rematch i would like to see it played on Shanes table of choice which is a diamond. If that happened Shane would Beat Mika 30 plus racks. That was Mikas table and he still got destroyed.
Well, thanks for ruining the outcome for those of us who hadn't seen it. I had been avoiding all the Shane - Mika posts all week because I was going to buy the DVD when it came out.
Why put the outcome in the title like that?
Why put the outcome in the title like that?
Well, it would impossible for you not to figure out who won in all the time it's going to take before the DVD's come out. People talk far too much. Just still enjoy that no matter what you know or what stats you've read... nothing is quite like actually watching it happen.
Well, it would impossible for you not to figure out who won in all the time it's going to take before the DVD's come out. People talk far too much. Just still enjoy that no matter what you know or what stats you've read... nothing is quite like actually watching it happen.
Yeah, maybe you're right. It just sucks that I couldn't even make it 12 hours without seeing it. I figured if I could avoid seeing it this week, and stay out of the Action forum, I'd be fine.
Who is this? Another Tucson guy......
Just a lil info....Scott beat SVB a while back. Shane was much younger and inexperienced then. The last time they played it was pretty one sided, Scott didn't get many chances at the table.
In this matchup, Shane showed that his 10 ball break is 2nd to none. At their level, the break is the whole game. Shane was making balls on the break about 92% of the time and Mika was somewhere around 56%. Getting the 1st shot in the game means that you have control. Control to make the 1st shot or play a safety.
If the game was 9 ball, it may have been a much closer match. It's hard to compete with Shane in a race to 100 10 ball.
