Sincere clarification questions about Stan's CTE/ProOne method

Shaft

Hooked and Improving
Silver Member
I bought the video. I still have questions. I could have PM'd Stan, but I thought I would ask the forum in case others could help me. I started a new thread because this is not a criticism or a debate, but a set of clarification questions.

1. I follow what Stan is saying about finding the edge lines, but I do not understand how he sets the initial bridge position and aiming line (just before the pivot) based on those "visuals." This is critically important. If the initial bridge and aim line are wrong, the system shouldn't work.

2. I understand finding both the CTE line, and the line between the CB edge and OB points A and C. Those two lines will geometrically converge. However, the CTE line and the line between the CB edge and OB point B are parallel and do not converge, so how can you see both of these lines at the same time? Or do you let your eyes "blur" and try to see them as equally well as possible?

3. If the CB is at location 21 and the OB is at location 9, there would be a certain aiming line and pivot. Fine. Would this be the same aiming line and pivot if the balls were at 22 and 10 (one diamond further away from the pocket)? If so, wouldn't the shot hit the long rail one diamond short of the pocket?

4. I completely miss how to do the ProOne pivot.

This is (hopefully) not a debate thread. I am open minded and just need clarification. Please limit responses to attempts to anwer these questions. (Post your debate somewhere else.)
 
Thanks Neil.
I did not try to read 6 pages of that thread cuz I thought it was going to be nothing but argument....
Thanks.
 
Has ANYONE thought to pick up the phone and ask Stan Shuffet these questions?

Just wondering? Email them to him? PM?

It seems to me that he would be the guy to ask, it's his video and his version of CTE and now it's out there.

Wouldn't it be better to at least try and get the answers from him first before asking a bunch of people who are at best one step removed from the author?
 
Perhaps Stan is waiting for a while longer, now that the video is just getting "out there", but I would guess he will likely address some of the questions issued here. At least that's my perception given how he has responded in previous posts here, and about the DVD in particular.

Just a guess, mind you. He hasn't been shy talking about the subject here, and posting answers here would likely save some telephone time, perhaps.
 
Perhaps Stan is waiting for a while longer, now that the video is just getting "out there", but I would guess he will likely address some of the questions issued here. At least that's my perception given how he has responded in previous posts here, and about the DVD in particular.

Just a guess, mind you. He hasn't been shy talking about the subject here, and posting answers here would likely save some telephone time, perhaps.

He's probably at derby city.
 
Back
Top