So I was watching 'Banks that don't go - but do' yesterday by the Beard and was curious about a set of banks he was talking about. He was talking about the cushions being ever-so-slightly rounded near the corner pockets as a result of the cloth being stretched tightly. I have seen many 1P players use this flaw(?) to their advantage to making balls reverse off the long rail (and short rail, for that matter).
My question is, is this something mechanics try to avoid, or is it just an accepted happenstance or trade-off for better fitting cloth? It seems like in a 'perfect world', this rounding would not occur.
I have tried some of these banks on my table, and I don't notice any reversing at all unless I throw some spin onto the OB (realizing of course that my ability level or lack thereof probably has more to do with it not reversing back). I know that some players use the actual point of the cushion to adjust the rebound angle, but The Beard stated specifically that the corners were rounded because of the cloth being stretched tightly around the point.
I guess the follow up question would be that if it can and should be avoided, what techniques do the mechanics use to avoid it?
My question is, is this something mechanics try to avoid, or is it just an accepted happenstance or trade-off for better fitting cloth? It seems like in a 'perfect world', this rounding would not occur.
I have tried some of these banks on my table, and I don't notice any reversing at all unless I throw some spin onto the OB (realizing of course that my ability level or lack thereof probably has more to do with it not reversing back). I know that some players use the actual point of the cushion to adjust the rebound angle, but The Beard stated specifically that the corners were rounded because of the cloth being stretched tightly around the point.
I guess the follow up question would be that if it can and should be avoided, what techniques do the mechanics use to avoid it?