Slow play by pros

And people keep asking for tighter and tighter pockets. Modern pool has turned into safety-filled 'cinch' pool drudgery. Without refs/clocks its virtually un-watchable. It has ZERO flow that pool had back in the CamelTour days.
Agree 100%!!!!!!!
 
I'm watching this tournament Battle of the bull and I'm kind of mystified by the incredible slow play by the professionals. They seem to stand over shots walk back and forth for no reason and take forever to play obvious position play. The more I watch the more it seems to be almost all of the players play with this style now.

Very robotic and actually difficult to watch. I actually turned it off last night. Go ahead and attack me if you want I don't really care but I prefer watching Earl play or Keith or any number of the older players who play the game not frightened to death of everything.
Is this now the new norm that we can expect? Pool playing robots.
Have you not seen any pro pool from the last decade???
 
Part of slow play is likely the risk of a mistake. These players know if they miss (be it a pocket or a safe) they'll likely lose the rack, so they're going to analyze it as long as they feel they need to. The margins are razor thin at the elite level, and there's money and livelihood on the line.

There's no excuse for amateurs to be playing slow though. I think of myself as a pretty deliberate player, but when I've tested myself on a shot clock I haven't felt rushed and rarely need an extension. 30s is a lot of time if you're focused on playing.
 
Just spit balling here but how about finding a way to incentivize speedy play. Maybe offer a bonus to the fastest played match. $2k (or whatever) split between the 2 players or top 10 fastest. A race within a race.

It’s either the carrot or the stick. Seems pool players probably prefer the carrot.
 
I'm not buying that the switch to tighter pockets in any way explains slow play. In fact, slow play was just as big a problem 10-15 years ago when the pockets were much looser.

Slow play persists because it is tolerated. There is an old saying about pro pool and it is "give the players all day to shoot and that's exactly how long they will take."

As those who play on Mike Zuglan's Joss Northeast Tour know, slow play is not tolerated. If a match is scheduled for two hours and Mike sees that it is 3-2 at the one-hour mark, he will get in the players' faces and tell them to hurry up. He's the exception.

The WPBA had a nice approach in the 1990s and 2000s. If a race to nine was scheduled for two hours, if the players had not completed eight racks by the one-hour mark, the remainder of the match would be played on the shot clock, with a volunteer overseeing the match with a stopwatch. The very prospect of having to go onto the shot clock motivated the players to keep things moving, and not many matches ended up on the shot clock.

In a perfect world, at least at the majors, there would be a shot clock in every match (or at least in every Stage 2 match) but it costs money to have that many referees and shot clock operators, and pool operates on pretty small profit margins to start with. The chess clock solution might well work, but nobody seems willing to try it.

I agree with all those who suggest that the lack of a shot clock reduces the quality of the pro pool offering, making the game less exciting to watch.
I think a chess clock is the best option, and I'll say that anytime it's mentioned. Maybe it'll catch on eventually. I think this could even operate without any officials/timekeepers.

There are options for a delay and an increment which could make it more suited to pool where players need to take time to approach and leave the table.
 
I think a chess clock is the best option, and I'll say that anytime it's mentioned. Maybe it'll catch on eventually. I think this could even operate without any officials/timekeepers.

There are options for a delay and an increment which could make it more suited to pool where players need to take time to approach and leave the table.
say each player had a clock at his/her chair. they clock 'in' and have 45sec to walk to/play their shot. if the bell/alarm/air horn ;) goes off their turn is over. three violations you lose the match. problem solved.
 
say each player had a clock at his/her chair. they clock 'in' and have 45sec to walk to/play their shot. if the bell/alarm/air horn ;) goes off their turn is over. three violations you lose the match. problem solved.
I don’t think this particular implementation would work because an inning might last several minutes without returning to the chair. The whole idea of a chess clock is that the time limit is per game, not per shot or inning.
 
I don’t think this particular implementation would work because an inning might last several minutes without returning to the chair. The whole idea of a chess clock is that the time limit is per game, not per shot or inning.
then re-start the clock 'each shot' like chess. my main gist is with all the tech. and AI bullshit surely there's gotta be a simple/cheap/effective way to speed these snails up/
 
And people keep asking for tighter and tighter pockets. Modern pool has turned into safety-filled 'cinch' pool drudgery. Without refs/clocks its virtually un-watchable. It has ZERO flow that pool had back in the CamelTour days.
I absolutely agree with you. You watch pool now, The flow and freedom to play is not the same.
That is why, i think the game has slowed right down.very hard to watch. 9 ball has always been a pressure game.
9 ball should be an exciting game. But much like watching snooker, with ronnie or Jack Lisowski. Id rather watch those two, more than anybody else, because you want to see, what might happen. In a way i find snooker easier to watch than pool.at least someone will go for it. Win or loose, at least you had a go.
 
Last edited:
then re-start the clock 'each shot' like chess. my main gist is with all the tech. and AI bullshit surely there's gotta be a simple/cheap/effective way to speed these snails up/
Slow is slow no matter how people try and dress it up. Even some officials watching, the games, must see some matches taking too long. If its part of the game now, i doubt much will change.
 
if you have a shot clock it also slows the game down as players get used to it and take most all the time allowed each shot.
and make that their pace of play instead of quick shooting for most.

no one seems to get it. it is only a handful of players that cause this. deal with them personally.
 
if you have a shot clock it also slows the game down as players get used to it and take most all the time allowed each shot.
and make that their pace of play instead of quick shooting for most.

no one seems to get it. it is only a handful of players that cause this. deal with them personally.
I'm no player but it's no biggie to fire at whatever dead outs come up. Still, even I can figure anybody not in the fast lane better break it down and slow down. You can't fault people for doing it how they do it.
Rather than bitch about clock riding, I propose a master clock like NFL or NBA. Now by shifting the priority to ball total instead of Da Nine or Da Tiyen, players stalling will bomb out instead of clearing their round. You get all the pool minus the nitty BS just for adjusting your sense of style.
 
calling the slow players robots
They seem to stand over shots walk back and forth for no reason and take forever to play obvious position play. The more I watch the more it seems to be almost all of the players play with this style now.

Very robotic and actually difficult to watch.

i understand what you’re saying,
but doesn’t ‘robotic’ imply efficient and fast?
 
I'm no player but it's no biggie to fire at whatever dead outs come up. Still, even I can figure anybody not in the fast lane better break it down and slow down. You can't fault people for doing it how they do it.
Rather than bitch about clock riding, I propose a master clock like NFL or NBA. Now by shifting the priority to ball total instead of Da Nine or Da Tiyen, players stalling will bomb out instead of clearing their round. You get all the pool minus the nitty BS just for adjusting your sense of style.
I realize nobody wants to adopt this so by way of taking up my own slack, I see that bombing the match in this format can hurt the opposing player - not much math to play proof the situation. Gotta let this digest for a while.
 
I'm watching this tournament Battle of the bull and I'm kind of mystified by the incredible slow play by the professionals. They seem to stand over shots walk back and forth for no reason and take forever to play obvious position play. The more I watch the more it seems to be almost all of the players play with this style now.

Very robotic and actually difficult to watch. I actually turned it off last night. Go ahead and attack me if you want I don't really care but I prefer watching Earl play or Keith or any number of the older players who play the game not frightened to death of everything.
Is this now the new norm that we can expect? Pool playing robots.
For the 100th time.. they are playing on tighter equipment then those older players ever played on and they are doing to pay their bills. Not just to pass the time. Of course they play slow and take their time. No difference then comparing amateur to pro golf.
 
For the 100th time.. they are playing on tighter equipment then those older players ever played on and they are doing to pay their bills. Not just to pass the time. Of course they play slow and take their time. No difference then comparing amateur to pro golf.

so is josh filler, soufi, jayson.. not to mention ronnie o'sullivan. what you don't think the slow ones are used to tight pockets? it's not like their practice tables are GCIII's with 5" pockets.

they're slow because they are allowed to be. and they shouldn't be allowed to be.
 
so is josh filler, soufi, jayson.. not to mention ronnie o'sullivan. what you don't think the slow ones are used to tight pockets? it's not like their practice tables are GCIII's with 5" pockets.

they're slow because they are allowed to be. and they shouldn't be allowed to be.
Too much is made of the tight pockets. I wonder if the people bashing 4” pockets have spent significant time playing on them. The table plays really fair with cleanish balls and newish felt, even for a chump like me.
 
Too much is made of the tight pockets. I wonder if the people bashing 4” pockets have spent significant time playing on them. The table plays really fair with cleanish balls and newish felt, even for a chump like me.
And that would be the same for everybody. Its not like, its a new thing in pool. Tight pockets been around a long time.it seems only last few years, events have been promoted with this idea, that it will make the game better.
 
how do you know that?

would snooker have grown to what it's become without alex higgins, jimmy white and ronnie o'sullivan?

in pool it's rare to find someone who dislikes watching guys like drago, luc salvas, soufi. most people like it.

i don't think we can force pro players to become fast players, of course. but use more shot clocks, and shame the super slow players..
I see your point but I think the biggest watched final was Davis Taylor. And Davis was not know for speed!
 
Back
Top