Snooker is hard enough without this ...

That picture doesn't look like it is 8 by 12 feet. I think the person made a typo in the description. :p :D
 
They're supposed to be 12 foot. You've been playing on the barbox version.

Edit: Oops it's supposed to be 12X6. I see now.
 
Table should be 6x12 but I guess when it's listed by a new member of ebay with Zero feedback it can be listed as 8x12....LOL
 
That table is the ashbee. I don't have it available in anything larger than 9 ft. Brunswick website shows 9 footer as well. Possibly a special edition?
 
most likely a typo, never seen a snooker table with 4 legs, personally believe that the middle of table gona holddown if it is 4 legs.:p

still the pic looks nice, brunswick always makes a lot of classic tables.
 
That doesn't even look like a snooker table to me, looks like a regular pool table. Four legs and big pockets...something fishy going on there.
 
bud green said:
That doesn't even look like a snooker table to me, looks like a regular pool table. Four legs and big pockets...something fishy going on there.
Click to expand...

I was simply being a smartass with this thread on what I though was a funny typo, but after looking closer I see what you mean. The corner pocket looks huge relative to the long rail if this were a 6x12 snooker table. If in fact this is a smaller table like a 4.5x9 or 4x8 I might reconsider how difficult snooker is to play. :D

Dave
 
I worked on a Brusnwick Pinhurst today that was a 9' table that was a snooker. It even had the step cushions. But the pocket openings where huge.
 
smittie1984 said:
I worked on a Brusnwick Pinhurst today that was a 9' table that was a snooker. It even had the step cushions. But the pocket openings where huge.
Click to expand...

A 9 foot snooker table!?!?!?!?!?!? :eek:

travesty

:D
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top