All these well intended cue maker suggestions are totally irrelevant.
I'm on his ignore list, so perhaps someone could ask him what he's seeking that his 9 previous cues have all failed to provide?
Maybe then there's a chance, albeit a slim one, that he'll understand that he must play with a cue beforehand. Any other approach is meaningless.
I don't think I can stand to read the plethora of threads that will inevitably come along once he magically, mysteriously and second handedly determines a cue maker. E.g. Which shaft, what diameter, which tip, which wood, which joint, what ferrule material, which weight, which grip, ad infinitem...:smash:
I'm on his ignore list, so perhaps someone could ask him what he's seeking that his 9 previous cues have all failed to provide?
Maybe then there's a chance, albeit a slim one, that he'll understand that he must play with a cue beforehand. Any other approach is meaningless.
I don't think I can stand to read the plethora of threads that will inevitably come along once he magically, mysteriously and second handedly determines a cue maker. E.g. Which shaft, what diameter, which tip, which wood, which joint, what ferrule material, which weight, which grip, ad infinitem...:smash: