Thanks, Ratta!
I agree! Stroke is hugely important!!
But, since my high finish at the Open I have reflected on the WHY many times.
At this stage as a player, my visual skills are far superior to my physical act of stroking. In past decades my visual skills were inconsistent and lacked any real structure and were quite weak as far as approaching the game in a professional manner.
I went into the U S Ooen with the confidence that I could match my visual skills with any player there. Now, stroke, that's another story. I am lucky to be even an average bear in such a field but over the years I have worked to develop a stroke structure that could stand the test of battle....I have succeeded at that to some degree but there is still much work to be done in that area.
Anyway, I can vividly recall critical shots against strong players that if it had not been for my visual connection with the table, I would have weakened and spiraled downward. Yes, I still had to come through with stroke, but , my physical success was a direct result of my perceptual connection with the table.
Ultimately, my stroke finally took me down. At 10-8 and a near perfect match with Daryl Peach, I missed a draw shot and that spelled my doom. I had a reasonable chance at that point to make top 16.
At age 63 I am still improving, mostly as a result of my visual work. Yes, my stroke is slowly getting a little better but the reason I can say at this ripe old age that I am not over the hill yet is all about the visual and not so much about the physical. It's the visual that drives me to keep the physical going .... Otherwise, I'd be saying my best game was a decade or two ago.
Stan Shuffett