Snapshot9 said:
Questions to be debated:
1) Should State Championship tournaments (ie, 8 or 9 ball)
allow out of state players to play? or just in state players?
(some states vary on this)
Well, since I just got back from the Virginia STATE CHAMPIONSHIP tournament in Richmond, I can add a little food for thought to the thread.
I believe a STATE championship should be restricted to the State. In the instance of Virginia, the tournament director decided to include the District of Columbia. Being that I live in D.C., I was grateful and appreciative that he included the Nation's Capital, since D.C. residents continue to taxed without representation and do not enjoy the same rights as their State counterparts.
The last Maryland State tournament was held in 1986 and was run by yours truly. If they ever resurrect it, I'd like to see them include D.C. as well, but then again, I'm just a little bit prejudiced. I happen to live a half-a-block from the D.C.-Maryland line.
D.C. has had its share of legendary players, Strawberry Brooks, "Jackie Robinson," Sterling, but most D.C. pool players, the ones who have a passion for the game/sport, do venture on out to Maryland or Virginia to play pool.
Snapshot9 said:
2) Should known pros, or pro quality (like pro road players) be excluded or not?
I think it depends on the venue. If the aim of the STATE CHAMPIONSHIP is for amateur-level players, then I would say yes.
However, if the word "OPEN" in included in the title, then I would think the doors would be open to all, bar-bangers, aspiring hopefuls, young guns, UPA Touring pros, league players, social shooters, road players, and, yes, the "pro road players." LOL!
Snapshot9 said:
3) Should State championship tournaments that are like
BCA sponsored provide all expense paid for trip to the winner
to the National tournament?
Sounds like a good idea to me, but then again, it may be a tough sell.
JAM