Shawn Putnam said:Keep in mind. Native Floridians, not transplants.
Shawn... Cory wasn't born in OH.. he from the east coast.... of so I was told.
Last edited:
Shawn Putnam said:Keep in mind. Native Floridians, not transplants.
All of his wins and knowledge has been since he was adopted by Dee Adkins and his family.Tom In Cincy said:Shawn... Corey wasn't born in OH.. he from the east coast.... of so I was told.
Snapshot9 said:I think a state vs. state competition is a good idea.
But, I think it should be conducted:
1) No pros allowed (too much stacking the deck)
Shawn Putnam said:Lets design a State vs. State challenge where 5 of the best players from each state battle for the honor of there State. Example= Ohio vs. Florida.
World Pool.com will film each match and hopefully through sponsorships we can generate alot of money for the players.
Give me some feedback ?
cuesmith said:. Last I heard he was too busy working at K-Mart to play in tournaments.
just more hot air!
Sherm
What happens to the pro in your State that can't play because an amature has his spot he worked his whole life for.woody_968 said:Why not have a pro and amature level at the same time? Would be great for all the amatures to see the pros in action. And would give good exposure (to those that want it) to the amatures.
Shawn Putnam said:What happens to the pro in your State that can't play because an amature has his spot he worked his whole life for.
I agree with you but lets get this off the ground first and then bring the amatures in if it works.woody_968 said:Maybe I wasnt clear. I meant have a pro division and an amature division. Two seperate teams. One wouldnt be taking a spot from the other. They would just hold both divisions during the same timeframe to help draw fans for both divisions
Shawn Putnam said:Lets design a State vs. State challenge where 5 of the best players from each state battle for the honor of there State. Example= Ohio vs. Florida.
World Pool.com will film each match and hopefully through sponsorships we can generate alot of money for the players.
Give me some feedback ?
Start with David Rowellsmackmac said:Here in Alabama it will be tuff to get the players.
Shawn Putnam said:Start with David Rowell
I agree as long as they were born in the USA.Jude Rosenstock said:There are several problems with having amateurs compete. For starters, no amateur can commit to traveling every month. On top of that, you have to define what an amateur is.
I'd stick with the professionals simply because it's well-defined and you can gain a commitment from the participants. As for who should play and who shouldn't, that's a difficult question. In New York City, I'm not sure if our best players were born here even though they've spent most of their lives here. I think if someone has been living in that state for a certain number of years, they should be considered eligible. In my opinion, 5 years is a good place to start.
Shawn Putnam said:I agree as long as they were born in the USA.
Other countrys have there own stuff that we can't get in .
It's time for us to follow suite.
So your saying its alright for other countries to bar us from there tourneys but we should let them in ours with open arms ?Jude Rosenstock said:Well, I believe this country prides itself on its immigration policy. We are a country of immigrants. What other countries do is their prerogrative and says a lot about their ideology. I think, instead of following another country's mistake, we should lead by example. What do we do about the many hispanics that have called this country home? What do we do about players who have forfeited the citizenship of their birthplace so that they can call themselves Americans? I understand that you feel a player should have some sort of affiliation with their home state but let us not forget what this country is all about.
Shawn Putnam said:So your saying its alright for other countries to bar us from there tourneys but we should let them in ours with open arms ?
Shawn,Jude Rosenstock said:I'm not saying it's alright. I'm simply saying that two wrongs don't make a right. On top of that, our demographics are much different than many of these other countries. It's one thing for Finland to have an exclusive national championship when the overwhelming majority of the people who live there were born there. It's quite another thing to have it in America when you consider the number of people who are foreign-born.
You're comparing apples and oranges. This is America. You'd be hard-pressed to find ANYONE on this board who cannot trace their ancestry to an immigrant. As the great-grandson of a man who crossed Europe in a hay-cart to find a better life, I will NEVER condone exclusion of foreign-born persons from anything other than the Presidency (and even then, I must raise an eye-brow).
If someone lives here, pays taxes here, has sworn their allegence to our beloved flag, they should have a right to conduct themselves as any other American, especially when it comes to something like pool. Do you realize that there are foreign-born persons fighting in Iraq, as we speak, under the American Flag? I think you can set standards that would still maintain the integrity you wish to obtain yet still be inclusive enough that people don't argue. Do you realize, the standards you suggest are even greater than that for the US Senate? I suggest proof of legal residency of no less than five years in the state you wish to represent for eligibility.
Shawn Putnam said:Lets design a State vs. State challenge where 5 of the best players from each state battle for the honor of there State. Example= Ohio vs. Florida.
World Pool.com will film each match and hopefully through sponsorships we can generate alot of money for the players.
Give me some feedback ?