Kim Bye AzB Silver Member Silver Member Oct 28, 2014 #21 Nice I guess, but 12 years is crazy! So many cuemakers that can build a cue just as good at less than 1/12 of the waiting time.
Nice I guess, but 12 years is crazy! So many cuemakers that can build a cue just as good at less than 1/12 of the waiting time.
P pickngrin Member Oct 28, 2014 #22 Kim Bye said: Nice I guess, but 12 years is crazy! So many cuemakers that can build a cue just as good at less than 1/12 of the waiting time. Click to expand... That's because they have 1/12 as many people who want their cues.
Kim Bye said: Nice I guess, but 12 years is crazy! So many cuemakers that can build a cue just as good at less than 1/12 of the waiting time. Click to expand... That's because they have 1/12 as many people who want their cues.
dannylee AzB Silver Member Silver Member Oct 30, 2014 #23 Kim Bye said: Nice I guess, but 12 years is crazy! So many cuemakers that can build a cue just as good at less than 1/12 of the waiting time. Click to expand... Maybe just as good looking but i have yet to run across a cue that hits as good as sw... less a kersenbrock or ed young
Kim Bye said: Nice I guess, but 12 years is crazy! So many cuemakers that can build a cue just as good at less than 1/12 of the waiting time. Click to expand... Maybe just as good looking but i have yet to run across a cue that hits as good as sw... less a kersenbrock or ed young