Sorry
I'm sorry but I really have to disagree with most on here.
I don't think the tight pockets affected the American pros at all. Sure, Americans missed balls but so did everyone else. Was I the only one watching when Bustamante jawed a gimme 9-ball when he was up 5-1? Or Lining miss the hill-hill 9-ball in the corner?
I think everyone is focusing so much on the finals and not looking at the actual level of play. I watched Earl run out from nowhere when he could. In fact i don't recall him missing a shot except empty breaks or failed safes.
Additionally, go back and check the groups scores. Archer was undefeated! 7 matches played, 7 matches won. Somehow I get the impression Archer had good reason to favor the tight pockets. It just so happens that he lost his first match in the elimination stages.
Morris and Strickland also had admirable records in the group stages, each finishing with 5-2 records to easily make it to the elimination rounds.
And to anyone knocking Rodney when playing Kuo, I'm guessing you weren't all watching when he drilled Luc Salvas 10-2 earlier in the tournament. Rodney missed maybe 1 or 2 balls the entire match. Otherwise the only time Luc got ot the table was when Rodney broke dry, scratched, or played safe.
I think the Americans did just fine, but at the end of the day it just so happened that two Taiwanese players made the finals. This can't be much of a surprise after last year's home court advantage when a flood of Taiwanese players took some top spots.
When all is said and done, we had 3 players in the top 16 (Morris, Deuel, Jones) despite only having 12 players who started out in the group stages. And of those 12, 9 made it past the group stages to the top 64. Are you forgetting that the group stages were played on the same tight pocket tables that the top 64 were played on? Give credit where it's due, and don't start knocking all the Americans just because we didn't get in the finals.
Two more bits:
1 - Most US pros don't practice on big sloppy bucket pockets. Go to any pool hall with a house pro and they're playing on 4" or 4 1/4" pockets. They're all tight. Just because tournaments are played in big buckets doesn't mean that the pros practice on them. Whether it's Tony Chohan at Hard Times, Max Eberle at Hollywood Billiards or Jose Parica at Hard Times, all the pros play on tight pockets until it comes time for tournament day. What makes everyone here think that the pros aren't already used to tight pockets?
2 - Wu's performance against Alain Martel in the group stages was embarrassing for a world champion. He was playing sloppily, missed makeable cuts, and missed some bank shots by a very large margin. Everyone's jumping on the Americans for missing, but why not the others?
I'm sorry but I really have to disagree with most on here.
I don't think the tight pockets affected the American pros at all. Sure, Americans missed balls but so did everyone else. Was I the only one watching when Bustamante jawed a gimme 9-ball when he was up 5-1? Or Lining miss the hill-hill 9-ball in the corner?
I think everyone is focusing so much on the finals and not looking at the actual level of play. I watched Earl run out from nowhere when he could. In fact i don't recall him missing a shot except empty breaks or failed safes.
Additionally, go back and check the groups scores. Archer was undefeated! 7 matches played, 7 matches won. Somehow I get the impression Archer had good reason to favor the tight pockets. It just so happens that he lost his first match in the elimination stages.
Morris and Strickland also had admirable records in the group stages, each finishing with 5-2 records to easily make it to the elimination rounds.
And to anyone knocking Rodney when playing Kuo, I'm guessing you weren't all watching when he drilled Luc Salvas 10-2 earlier in the tournament. Rodney missed maybe 1 or 2 balls the entire match. Otherwise the only time Luc got ot the table was when Rodney broke dry, scratched, or played safe.
I think the Americans did just fine, but at the end of the day it just so happened that two Taiwanese players made the finals. This can't be much of a surprise after last year's home court advantage when a flood of Taiwanese players took some top spots.
When all is said and done, we had 3 players in the top 16 (Morris, Deuel, Jones) despite only having 12 players who started out in the group stages. And of those 12, 9 made it past the group stages to the top 64. Are you forgetting that the group stages were played on the same tight pocket tables that the top 64 were played on? Give credit where it's due, and don't start knocking all the Americans just because we didn't get in the finals.
Two more bits:
1 - Most US pros don't practice on big sloppy bucket pockets. Go to any pool hall with a house pro and they're playing on 4" or 4 1/4" pockets. They're all tight. Just because tournaments are played in big buckets doesn't mean that the pros practice on them. Whether it's Tony Chohan at Hard Times, Max Eberle at Hollywood Billiards or Jose Parica at Hard Times, all the pros play on tight pockets until it comes time for tournament day. What makes everyone here think that the pros aren't already used to tight pockets?
2 - Wu's performance against Alain Martel in the group stages was embarrassing for a world champion. He was playing sloppily, missed makeable cuts, and missed some bank shots by a very large margin. Everyone's jumping on the Americans for missing, but why not the others?