the highs, the lows

Dave

AzB Silver Member
Silver Member
Last week I had the good fortune to attend the straight pool championship for the first four days. This was my fourth year. It’s a real treat to see the game played at the highest level. It inspires me and I love it.

There is an aspect of seeing all this live play that doesn’t seem to be talked about much. Well, hear me out >>> the game played not at the highest level.
There’s something re-assuring about seeing great players who consistently perform well miss a shot or an opportunity. They come down to earth, however fleeting that may be. They are professional and will put their poor play aside, re-focus and play well again. That’s professional. My runs are quite a bit shorter and my bonehead lapses more frequent, more egregious and amateurish, but I do take some comfort in knowing that Thorsten and Darren have a few bad moments too.
Let me be clear, I don’t want them to contract the pox, miss a shot or play badly. I’ll vote for a two players playing their best every time.

I watched, up close, a match between two well-known players that turned into an excruciating grinder that wouldn’t end …lot’s of missed shots, poor position, loss of focus and expressions of frustration. It seemed they were both in a funk from which they couldn’t escape. They were put on the time clock and it seemed merciful.
The end was near and the soon to be winner missed a pretty straightforward shot, needing less than a rack to finish. He came back to his seat, which was directly in front of me, put down his cue and paused, looked off into the distance and said, for all to hear, “I suck!... We suck!”


I’m going to remember that! At some point, when I’ve missed a shot or have a mental lapse, my exasperation will inspire an “I suck”. I hope I’ll be able to smile, muster the mettle and refocus... knowing that my game overlaps, in a minor way, with some of the heavyweights who play the game brilliantly.
 
I saw and heard that. I believe this was the only match where a time clock had to be used. The first 3 days tends to have some lower level matches. Some of the players who enter the round robin stages are people who want the experience of playing with the best. These players hope to play their best and win two or three matches.

Each bracket contains two or three pro or open level players. You may also find a dark horse in each bracket.

Once you get past the round robin stages there are mostly excellent players. Of these last 24 players there were probably 8-10 players who had a realistic chance of winning the whole thing.
 
I didn't see any of the tournament, unfortunately. Was this an early round with qualifier players, or one of the Hohmann type matches? It seemed to me I recall one top tier player match that didn't go well. Was that the one?
 
This was not a round robin match. These were two top level players.
To be clear, it didn't involve Hohmann or Appleton, they came to mind as exemplary players.
The take away being> Everyone has those moments when thing don't go well, you're not alone.
 
Archer- Cohen if I remember correctly. The comment was made by Archer. They both missed a few shots they should not have. Archer finally won the match. Johnny was very frustrated by his own play.
They both argued over some shots that they thought was a push. First Cohen thought Archer had pushed a shot. Then later Archer thought Cohen pushed.
 
Yep. Realizing that they are human makes it easier to accept that we are even more so!

I wish that helped… ;)

(Seriously: the only thing that helps me when I play bad - which I've been guilty of more often in my life than I care to admit - is when I can say to myself that I've learnt something from it - which isn't inevitably the case, nor always true, of course.)

Greetings from Switzerland, David.
_________________

„J'ai gâché vingt ans de mes plus belles années au billard. Si c'était à refaire, je recommencerais.“ – Roger Conti
 
Back
Top