I have been attending different tournaments and noticing many of them are easy to manage. Once the players sign up the tournament runs on "auto-pilot" meaning little skill is needed to manage problems.
Aside from high payouts and balanced matchups I noticed more severe problems. One was respecting the players time outside of the match as well as during the match. Second was alleviating expenses players incur to be in a tournament. Third was inviting players to voice out complaints.
Supposing the pros that go on tour just want to play pool against players at their level then the theory of high payouts is reduced to nothing. If the players want to play at their level of competition then the minimum they need are tables, players and referees (with today's technology a simple camera and desktop would do).
Aside from those points I don't know what professional pool players want. Any ideas are welcomed?
My underlying theory is pool players like playing pool and want to compete against players that invested as much time as they did. Who can make that happen is limited. How it can happen is simply number crunching.
Players do too much hotel, food, and relaxation management to play in tournaments, they should just go somewhere and everything is managed well for them.
A rating system based on cuts, banks, kicks and other technical shots could identify skill level properly for better matchups. The tournament elimination system could be based on playing several players but short races, this way the field gets all the action they can imagine. Essentially I believe a tournament is about the players competing not players making record runs.
There would not be an audience at the tournament either. It would be completely players only, and spectators can sign up for an online stream.
I prefer to see players at their best not whoever does the best in the worst possible situation.
Aside from high payouts and balanced matchups I noticed more severe problems. One was respecting the players time outside of the match as well as during the match. Second was alleviating expenses players incur to be in a tournament. Third was inviting players to voice out complaints.
Supposing the pros that go on tour just want to play pool against players at their level then the theory of high payouts is reduced to nothing. If the players want to play at their level of competition then the minimum they need are tables, players and referees (with today's technology a simple camera and desktop would do).
Aside from those points I don't know what professional pool players want. Any ideas are welcomed?
My underlying theory is pool players like playing pool and want to compete against players that invested as much time as they did. Who can make that happen is limited. How it can happen is simply number crunching.
Players do too much hotel, food, and relaxation management to play in tournaments, they should just go somewhere and everything is managed well for them.
A rating system based on cuts, banks, kicks and other technical shots could identify skill level properly for better matchups. The tournament elimination system could be based on playing several players but short races, this way the field gets all the action they can imagine. Essentially I believe a tournament is about the players competing not players making record runs.
There would not be an audience at the tournament either. It would be completely players only, and spectators can sign up for an online stream.
I prefer to see players at their best not whoever does the best in the worst possible situation.
Last edited: