Promoters have responsibilities to maximize prize fund, make match schedules convenient and provide reliable tournament rules and conditions.
Players have responsibilities to play matches at scheduled times and maintain proper attire.
How can such a simple relationship be strained so easily?
Do players need to self organize their disagreements with promoters?
Promoters should clearly state prize funds and conditions due to the literacy level of players.
Do promoters need to make it easier for players to learn their match times and tables, are courtesy calls needed?
Promoters can't expect players to follow through with certain behavior. If promoters want something it should be clearly explained repeatedly before an event starts.
Players can't expect promoters to deliver because promoters organize so many moving parts, but they can provide input on what is successful and what isn't. Its is their responsibility to learn different situations that come up and ask for prepared answers.
It feels like both sides have great ideas, but no one is willing to discuss them.
Players have responsibilities to play matches at scheduled times and maintain proper attire.
How can such a simple relationship be strained so easily?
Do players need to self organize their disagreements with promoters?
Promoters should clearly state prize funds and conditions due to the literacy level of players.
Do promoters need to make it easier for players to learn their match times and tables, are courtesy calls needed?
Promoters can't expect players to follow through with certain behavior. If promoters want something it should be clearly explained repeatedly before an event starts.
Players can't expect promoters to deliver because promoters organize so many moving parts, but they can provide input on what is successful and what isn't. Its is their responsibility to learn different situations that come up and ask for prepared answers.
It feels like both sides have great ideas, but no one is willing to discuss them.