The New Elitist Snob

Larry I think you're off base and you're selectively reading what stikapos wrote. You can't read half a sentence and get pissed off. At the very least, read the whole sentence (I say this because in your reply to stikapos in the other thread, you only highlighted half of one of his sentences. The bad half!)

Here's what you highlighted:
"the folks that frequent this forum simply aren't interested in your cue"
Which you seemed pissed off about.

But here's what he actually wrote:
"You can call me or anyone here anything you want. I'm not trying to flame you. The lesson to be learned here is that folks vote with their feet. Interpreted for you, that means that so far, the folks that frequent this forum simply aren't interested in your cue. If they were, you'd have sold it already."

And he's absolutely right, if ppl were interested in his cue, he would have sold it earlier. He's not speaking for anybody... he just stating the blatantly obvious.
 
hejests said:
Larry I think you're off base and you're selectively reading what stikapos wrote. You can't read half a sentence and get pissed off. At the very least, read the whole sentence (I say this because in your reply to stikapos in the other thread, you only highlighted half of one of his sentences. The bad half!)

Here's what you highlighted:
"the folks that frequent this forum simply aren't interested in your cue"
Which you seemed pissed off about.

But here's what he actually wrote:
"You can call me or anyone here anything you want. I'm not trying to flame you. The lesson to be learned here is that folks vote with their feet. Interpreted for you, that means that so far, the folks that frequent this forum simply aren't interested in your cue. If they were, you'd have sold it already."

And he's absolutely right, if ppl were interested in his cue, he would have sold it earlier. He's not speaking for anybody... he just stating the blatantly obvious.
Click to expand...

Objecting to the blatantly obvious for its own sake is perfectly acceptable. Selective reading of posts as a reason to start a fight is not. I'll apologize for the BO point, but not for being the butt of an unfair attack. This thread is over. Thankfully.

later,
tim
 
hejests said:
Larry I think you're off base and you're selectively reading what stikapos wrote. You can't read half a sentence and get pissed off. At the very least, read the whole sentence (I say this because in your reply to stikapos in the other thread, you only highlighted half of one of his sentences. The bad half!)

Here's what you highlighted:
"the folks that frequent this forum simply aren't interested in your cue"
Which you seemed pissed off about.

But here's what he actually wrote:
"You can call me or anyone here anything you want. I'm not trying to flame you. The lesson to be learned here is that folks vote with their feet. Interpreted for you, that means that so far, the folks that frequent this forum simply aren't interested in your cue. If they were, you'd have sold it already."

And he's absolutely right, if ppl were interested in his cue, he would have sold it earlier. He's not speaking for anybody... he just stating the blatantly obvious.
Click to expand...


and here's what i highlighted later after informing pos that he doesn't speak for anyone but himself -

Quote:
Originally Posted by stikapos
... Any way you slice it, just because no one (so far) wants to buy an adam cue, that fact does not mean that we are elitist or snobby or any other name you'd like to toss out. ... But don't piss and moan at us as being elitists and then expect us to open our wallets for your cue. It just doesn't work that way.
tim




as i said, speak for yourself. when you say "we" , exactly who are you referring to, besides your own elitist, snobby apa self? lmao!!
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top