I've been thinking about how to define the perfect end pattern. Is it necessarily the one that allows you to stop shot to perfect position for a break ball? Is it necessarily the easiest 3 or 4 ball sequence that you can play with no other balls present?
I don't believe so. I think more has to be taken into consideration.
In my opinion, the perfect end pattern has 3 assets:
1) It plays well with others. It allows all other balls to pass to pockets and stays out of the cue ball's way.
2) It's easy to fall on after all other balls are pocketed. Worth considering may be the location of the majority of balls to be pocketed. From that location, is the first ball in the end pattern easily accessible?
3) It's easy enough to play. It doesn't have to have perfect stop shots. It just has to be something you're capable of playing.
This perfect end pattern has to be a chameleon. It has to change from rack to rack depending upon the layout. If a stop shot pattern is available but blocks paths or has no easy setup route, it may be worth looking elsewhere for it's uglier but more amenable cousin.
I don't believe so. I think more has to be taken into consideration.
In my opinion, the perfect end pattern has 3 assets:
1) It plays well with others. It allows all other balls to pass to pockets and stays out of the cue ball's way.
2) It's easy to fall on after all other balls are pocketed. Worth considering may be the location of the majority of balls to be pocketed. From that location, is the first ball in the end pattern easily accessible?
3) It's easy enough to play. It doesn't have to have perfect stop shots. It just has to be something you're capable of playing.
This perfect end pattern has to be a chameleon. It has to change from rack to rack depending upon the layout. If a stop shot pattern is available but blocks paths or has no easy setup route, it may be worth looking elsewhere for it's uglier but more amenable cousin.